首页> 外文期刊>Journal of palliative medicine >The palliative care self-reported practices scale and the palliative care difficulties scale: reliability and validity of two scales evaluating self-reported practices and difficulties experienced in palliative care by health professionals.
【24h】

The palliative care self-reported practices scale and the palliative care difficulties scale: reliability and validity of two scales evaluating self-reported practices and difficulties experienced in palliative care by health professionals.

机译:姑息治疗自我报告行为量表和姑息治疗困难量表:两种量表的信度和效度,用于评估自我报告的行为和卫生专业人员在姑息治疗中遇到的困难。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The development of palliative care educational programs is ongoing in Japan. To assess the effectiveness of educational programs for general nurses, it is necessary to develop scales for evaluating them. AIMS: The aims of this study were to develop two scales to measure the effectiveness of palliative care educational programs and confirm the validity and reliability of the scales. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was validated with a group of 940 nurses at two facilities. The response rate was 85% (n = 797). This study used psychometric methods such as factor analysis and intra-class correlation coefficients. MAIN RESULTS: We selected 18 items in 6 domains, including "dying-phase care," patient- and family-centered care, communication this scale, the intra-class correlation was 0.64 to 0.74 in each domain. For the Palliative Care Difficulties Scale (PDCS), we selected 15 items in 5 domains, including "communication in multidisciplinary teams," "communication with the patient and family," "expert support," "alleviation of symptoms," and "community coordination." For the PCDS, the intraclass correlation was 0.61 to 0.69 in each domain. CONCLUSIONS: The validity and reliability of these scales were established. Therefore, the clarification of actual practices used and difficulties experienced will be possible using these scales.
机译:背景:日本正在开展姑息治疗教育计划的开发。为了评估普通护士教育计划的有效性,有必要制定评估计划。目的:本研究的目的是开发两个量表,以衡量姑息治疗教育计划的有效性,并确认量表的有效性和可靠性。方法:一项问卷调查被两个机构的940名护士组成。回应率为85%(n = 797)。本研究使用心理分析方法,例如因子分析和类内相关系数。主要结果:我们在6个领域中选择了18个项目,包括“临终阶段护理”,“以患者和家庭为中心的护理”,以这种量表进行沟通,在每个领域中类内相关性为0.64至0.74。对于姑息治疗困难量表(PDCS),我们在5个领域中选择了15个项目,包括“多学科团队的沟通”,“与患者和家人的沟通”,“专家支持”,“症状缓解”和“社区协调” 。”对于PCDS,每个域中的类内相关性为0.61至0.69。结论:建立了这些量表的有效性和可靠性。因此,使用这些量表可以澄清所使用的实际做法和遇到的困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号