首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >The politics of place: official, intermediate and community discourses in depopulated rural areas of Central Spain. The case of the Riaza river valley (Segovia, Spain).
【24h】

The politics of place: official, intermediate and community discourses in depopulated rural areas of Central Spain. The case of the Riaza river valley (Segovia, Spain).

机译:地方政治:西班牙中部人口稠密的农村地区的官方,中级和社区话语。 Riaza河谷(西班牙塞哥维亚)的案例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper provides theoretical and methodological arguments to study the politics of space in small marginal and depopulated areas of Spain. The case for research is the Riaza river valley in the province of Segovia. Usually the analysis of rural space (and the geographical space in general) provides opposing presentations: vertical, between global and local or horizontal between urban and rural or in community-out of community. Fewer contributions adopt as an objective the configuration of spatial categories into a small area. This contribution differentiates the politics of small rural areas into three main levels or spheres: (1) official, (2) unofficial or intermediate and (3) community or spontaneous. Between these levels there is conflict but also collaboration, founded on the specific nature of the situation or problem and the agents and actors involved in each one. The methods are mainly qualitative with complementary documentary sources (local newspapers, official documents from regional and environmental administration). The interview program presents two phases: (1) with people involved in the decision-making process at an area level and (2) with representative figures (in professional and social term) in the study area. The conclusions confirm the existence of different parallel and segmented discourses in each level and also between levels of decision-making.
机译:本文提供了理论和方法论上的论据来研究西班牙小边缘和人口稀少地区的空间政治。研究的案例是塞哥维亚省的里亚扎河谷。通常,对农村空间(以及总体上的地理空间)的分析提供了相反的表述:垂直,全球与本地之间或水平与城市之间,农村与社区之间或社区外。较少的贡献将空间类别配置成小区域作为目标。这种贡献将小农村地区的政治划分为三个主要层次或领域:(1)官方;(2)非官方或中级;(3)社区或自发。在这些级别之间存在冲突,但也有合作,这取决于情况或问题的具体性质以及每个参与者或参与者所涉及的代理和参与者。这些方法主要是利用补充文献资料(本地报纸,区域和环境管理局的官方文献)进行定性分析。访谈计划分为两个阶段:(1)与区域级别的决策过程相关的人员;(2)与研究区域的代表人物(在专业和社交方面)。结论证实了在每个级别以及决策级别之间存在不同的平行和分段话语。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号