...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >Money from and for forests: A critical reflection on the feasibility of market approaches for the conservation of Amazonian forests
【24h】

Money from and for forests: A critical reflection on the feasibility of market approaches for the conservation of Amazonian forests

机译:来自森林和来自森林的资金:对保护亚马逊森林的市场方法可行性的批判性思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The preservation of Amazonian natural forests is of utmost national and international interest. The exploration of market opportunities for the commercialization of forest goods and services has become the prevailing conservation approach. It is likely that the generation of income from forests will motivate forest owners and users to appreciate and use their resources more sustainably. After more than 20 years of applying, adjusting and expanding this approach, this paper critically reflects on its main assumptions, successes and consequences with a special emphasis on the Amazon's natural forests. Over time, three major strategies have been outlined to translate the approach into practice: (1) the management of timber by logging companies in forest concessions, (2) the use of timber and non-timber forest products by smallholders and communities, and (3) the selling of environmental services that forests provide, in particular carbon. The analysis revealed that the commercialization of goods and services from natural forests has indeed the potential to generate income, yet their financial attractiveness is rather limited if compared with other land use options. This seriously affects the probability that forest-related uses at a wider scale will be successful. It also became evident that the legal-institutional framework set up to facilitate economic gains from the forests' commercial potential tended to discriminate against traditional forest users who, due to disparate reasons, would be willing to accept the modest financial returns from managing natural forests in commercial ways. It is discussed that the feasibility of market approaches, in contrast to the assumptions of free market environmentalism, depends on effective measures to strengthen the role and market position of local forest users and on initiatives from firms to invest in the establishment of more sustainable commodities even when a reduction in profits are a possibility. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:保护亚马孙天然森林具有国家和国际的最大利益。探寻森林商品和服务商业化的市场机会已成为普遍的保护方法。来自森林的收入很可能会激励森林所有者和使用者更加可持续地欣赏和利用其资源。经过20多年的应用,调整和扩展,该方法批判性地反映了它的主要假设,成功和后果,特别强调了亚马逊的天然林。随着时间的流逝,已概述了将这种方法转化为实践的三种主要策略:(1)采伐森林特许权的伐木公司对木材的管理;(2)小农和社区对木材和非木材森林产品的使用;以及( 3)出售森林提供的环境服务,尤其是碳。分析显示,天然林商品和服务的商业化确实具有创造收入的潜力,但与其他土地利用方案相比,它们的财务吸引力相当有限。这严重影响了与森林有关的更广泛用途的成功实施的可能性。同样明显的是,为促进森林商业潜力的经济利益而建立的法律制度框架倾向于歧视传统的森林使用者,由于各种原因,他们愿意接受来自管理天然林的适度财务收益。商业方式。讨论的是,与自由市场环境主义的假设相反,市场方法的可行性取决于加强当地森林使用者的作用和市场地位的有效措施,还取决于公司投资于建立更可持续商品的倡议。当有可能减少利润时。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号