首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health policy >Beyond idealism and realism: Canadian NGO/government relations during the negotiation of the FCTC.
【24h】

Beyond idealism and realism: Canadian NGO/government relations during the negotiation of the FCTC.

机译:超越理想主义和现实主义:《公约》谈判期间的加拿大非政府组织/政府关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) marks a unique point in the history of global health governance. This convention produced the first legally binding treaty under the auspices of the World Health Organization. Another first was the extent to which non-governmental organizations (NGOs) participated in the negotiation process. This article explores the relationship between one group of NGOs and their respective government during the negotiation of the FCTC. Documentary analyses and 18 individual in-depth interviews were conducted with both government and NGO representatives. In contrast to the polar perspectives of idealism (NGOs as unique and autonomous) and realism (NGOs as funded arms of the government), our findings suggest that neither opposition nor conformity on the part of the NGOs characterize the relationship between the NGOs and government. While specific to the case under study (the FCTC), our findings nonetheless indicate the need for a nuanced view of the relationship between governments and NGOs, at least during the process of multilateral health policy negotiations.
机译:《烟草控制框架公约》(FCTC)标志着全球卫生治理历史上的独特点。该公约在世界卫生组织的主持下制定了第一份具有法律约束力的条约。另一个第一是非政府组织在多大程度上参与了谈判过程。本文探讨了在《公约》谈判期间一组非政府组织与其各自政府之间的关系。与政府和非政府组织的代表进行了文献分析和18次个人深入访谈。与理想主义(非政府组织是唯一的自治组织)和现实主义(非政府组织是政府的资助部门)的极端观点相反,我们的发现表明,非政府组织既没有反对也不符合,却没有刻画非政府组织与政府之间的关系。尽管针对所研究的案例(《烟草控制框架公约》),我们的调查结果表明,至少在多边卫生政策谈判过程中,需要对政府与非政府组织之间的关系有细微的了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号