...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Petroleum Science Research >The Use of Regression and Classification Algorithms for Layer Productivity Prediction in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs
【24h】

The Use of Regression and Classification Algorithms for Layer Productivity Prediction in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs

机译:回归和分类算法在天然裂缝性储层中产层预测中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Three regression algorithms and three classification algorithms have been applied to forecast naturally fractured layer productivity. The three regression algorithms are the regression of support vector machine (R-SVM), the back-propagation neural network (BPNN), and the multiple regression analysis (MRA), while the three classification algorithms are the classification of support vector machine (C-SVM), the naive Bayesian (NBAY), and the Bayesian successive discrimination (BAYSD). In general, when all these six algorithms are usedto solve a real-world problem, they often produce different solution accuracies. When an algorithm is applied to a real-world problem, its solution accuracy is expressed with the total mean absolute relative residual for all samples, R(%). In this paper, three criteria have been proposed: 1) nonlinearity degree of a studied problem based on R(%) of MRA (weak if R(%)<10, moderate if 1030); 2) solution accuracy of a given algorithm application based on its R(%) (high if R(%)<10, moderate if 10< R(%)<30, and low if R(%)>30); and 3) results availability of a given algorithm application (applicable if R(%)<10, and inapplicable if R(%)>10). A case study of naturally fractured layer productivity at an oilfield in Sichuan Province of China has been used to validate the proposed approach. This case study consists of two problems: regression and classification. For the regression problem, .R-SVM, BPNN and MRA are inapplicable because their R(%) values are 4620, 44 and 5980, respectively/For the classification problem, however, C-SVM, NBAY and BAYSD are all applicable since their R(%) values are 0, 5.9 and 9.1, respectively. From the case study, it is concluded that: a) the three proposed criteria, and the rules of conversion from real number to integer number are practical; b) R(%) of MRA is. used to measure the nonlinearity degree of a studied problem, and thus MRA should be used as a first choice; c) for classification problems, the preferable algorithm is C-SVM, NBAY, or BAYSD if the problems nonlinearity is weak or moderate, and BAYSD can also serve as a promising dimension-reduction tool; d) for regression problems, the preferable algorithm is BPNN, but MRA can serve as a promising dimension-reduction tool only when the problems are linear; e) if BPNN is inapplicable for a regression problem, it is proposed to change the problem from regression to classification by reasonable conversion rules, then apply C-SVM, NBAY, or BAYSD; and f) comparing with C-SVM, BAYSD is conditionally better.
机译:三种回归算法和三种分类算法已应用于预测自然裂缝层的产能。三种回归算法是支持向量机(R-SVM)的回归,反向传播神经网络(BPNN)和多元回归分析(MRA),而三种分类算法是支持向量机(C -SVM),朴素的贝叶斯(NBAY)和贝叶斯连续歧视(BAYSD)。通常,当将这六种算法全部用于解决实际问题时,它们通常会产生不同的解决方案精度。当算法应用于实际问题时,其求解精度用所有样本的总平均绝对相对残差R(%)表示。在本文中,提出了三个标准:1)基于MRA的R(%)的研究问题的非线性程度(如果R(%)<10,则为弱,如果10 30); 2)基于R(%)的给定算法应用的求解精度(如果R(%)<10,则为高;如果10 30,则为低); 3)得出给定算法应用程序的可用性(如果R(%)<10,则适用,如果R(%)> 10,则不适用)。以中国四川省某油田天然裂缝层产能为例,对所提方法进行了验证。该案例研究包含两个问题:回归和分类。对于回归问题,.R-SVM,BPNN和MRA不适用,因为它们的R(%)值分别为4620、44和5980 /对于分类问题,但是,由于C-SVM,NBAY和BAYSD均适用,因此R(%)值分别为0、5.9和9.1。从案例研究中可以得出以下结论:a)提出的三个准则以及从实数到整数的转换规则是可行的; b)MRA的R(%)为。用于测量研究问题的非线性程度,因此应将MRA作为首选; c)对于分类问题,如果问题的非线性程度较弱或中等,则首选算法为C-SVM,NBAY或BAYSD,并且BAYSD还可作为有希望的降维工具; d)对于回归问题,首选算法是BPNN,但是MRA仅在问题为线性时才可以用作有希望的降维工具; e)如果BPNN不适合回归问题,建议通过合理的转换规则将问题从回归更改为分类,然后应用C-SVM,NBAY或BAYSD; f)与C-SVM相比,BAYSD在条件上更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号