首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychoeducational assessment >Comparing Children's Performance on and Preference for a Number-Line Estimation Task: Tablet Versus Paper and Pencil
【24h】

Comparing Children's Performance on and Preference for a Number-Line Estimation Task: Tablet Versus Paper and Pencil

机译:比较儿童在数字线估计任务上的表现和偏好:平板电脑与纸和铅笔

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Tablet computers (tablets) are positioned to be powerful, innovative, effective, and motivating research and assessment tools. We addressed two questions critical for evaluating the appropriateness of using tablets to study number-line estimation, a skill associated with math achievement and argued to be central to numerical cognition. First, is performance with paper and pencil comparable with performance on a tablet? Second, is comparability affected by students' preference for one method of presentation? Thirty-two students in Grade 6 estimated targets on a number line; half estimated with paper and pencil and half with a tablet. For both presentation methods, students' performance was comparable. Students liked both presentation conditions equally but, when asked to choose, most students preferred the tablet. Preference did not influence comparability of results across presentation methods. Finally, students' reasons for their preferences were explored, along with implications for using tablet applications in research and educational assessment.
机译:平板电脑(平板电脑)的定位是功能强大,创新,有效并能激发研究和评估工具。我们提出了两个关键问题,这些问题对于评估使用数位板研究数字线估计的适当性至关重要,这是一项与数学成绩相关的技能,并被认为对数字认知至关重要。首先,纸和铅笔的性能与平板电脑的性能可比吗?第二,可比性是否受学生偏爱一种演示方法的影响? 6年级的32名学生在数字上估计了目标;一半用纸和铅笔估计,一半用平板电脑估计。对于这两种演示方法,学生的表现都是可比的。学生同样喜欢这两种演示条件,但是当被要求选择时,大多数学生都喜欢这款平板电脑。偏好不会影响表示方法之间结果的可比性。最后,探讨了学生偏好的原因,以及在研究和教育评估中使用平板电脑应用程序的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号