首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pediatric orthopaedics. Part B >Comparison between external fixation and elastic stable intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children younger than 8 years of age
【24h】

Comparison between external fixation and elastic stable intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children younger than 8 years of age

机译:外固定支架与弹性稳定髓内钉治疗8岁以下儿童股骨干骨折的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The main objective of this study was to compare external fixation (EF) with elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children aged 8 or younger. Fifteen children with femoral shaft fractures treated by EF and 23 children with femoral shaft fractures treated by ESIN were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were pain free at the last follow-up, with good ranges of motion in the hip and knee. Partial and full weight bearing occurred sooner in patients treated with EF than with ESIN, although more polytrauma patients were present in the ESIN group. In conclusion, EF and ESIN can be considered as safe and effective methods for femoral shaft fracture treatment in children younger than 8 years of age. Copyright (C) 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究的主要目的是比较外固定(EF)与弹性稳定的髓内钉(ESIN)治疗8岁或以下儿童股骨干骨折的情况。回顾性分析了15例接受EF治疗的股骨干骨折儿童和23例接受ESIN治疗的股骨干骨折儿童。所有患者在最后一次随访时均无疼痛,髋部和膝部活动范围广。 EF治疗的患者比ESIN患者更容易出现部分和完全负重,尽管ESIN组中存在多发伤患者。总之,对于8岁以下的儿童,EF和ESIN可被视为安全有效的股骨干骨折治疗方法。版权所有(C)2016 Wolters Kluwer Health,Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号