...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of oral rehabilitation >Comparison of the tensile bond strengths of cast metal crowns luted with resin cements.
【24h】

Comparison of the tensile bond strengths of cast metal crowns luted with resin cements.

机译:比较用树脂胶粘剂浇铸的金属冠的抗拉强度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

summary The limitation of photoactivation of dual-polymerized resin cements along the margins of metal restorations may adversely affect the mechanical properties of these cements, thus impairing the retention of restorations. The aim of this study was to assess the bond strength of cast metal crowns cemented with three dual-polymerized resin cements, using a chemically-activated resin cement and zinc phosphate as controls. Fifty nickel-chromium alloy crowns were cast and randomly assigned to five groups of equal size. Castings were cemented on their corresponding metal dies with one of the tested luting agents: Scotchbond Resin Cement, Enforce and Panavia F (dual-polymerized resin cements), Cement-It (chemically-activated resin cement) and Zinc Phosphate Cement (zinc phosphate cement). Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 h and then loaded in tension until failure. Panavia F and Zinc Phosphate Cement provided the highest and lowest bond strength means, respectively. Scotchbond Resin Cement, Enforce and Cement-It cements exhibited similar intermediate values, but with statistically significant difference compared to the other materials (P < 0.05). Even with the restriction or absence of light activation, all tested dual-polymerized resin cements produced significantly higher bond strength than did the zinc phosphate cement and yielded similar or better results than the chemically activated cement. It should be pointed out that the findings of this study relate to a test scenario which does not mimic clinical circumstances and that further work is required to identify the clinical significance of the reported tensile bond strength differences between the different luting materials.
机译:小结沿着金属修复体边缘的双聚合树脂水泥的光活化限制可能会不利地影响这些水泥的机械​​性能,从而损害修复体的保留。这项研究的目的是使用化学活化的树脂胶泥和磷酸锌作为对照,评估用三种双聚合树脂胶泥胶结的铸造金属牙冠的粘结强度。铸造五十个镍铬合金冠,并随机分配给五组相同大小的冠。用一种经过测试的胶合剂将铸件固定在其相应的金属模具上:苏格兰胶树脂水泥,Enforce和Panavia F(双聚合树脂水泥),Cement-It(化学活化树脂水泥)和磷酸锌水泥(磷酸锌水泥)。 )。将样品在37摄氏度的蒸馏水中保存24小时,然后加载张力直至失效。 Panavia F和磷酸锌水泥分别提供了最高和最低的粘结强度平均值。 Scotchbond Resin水泥,Enforce和Cement-It水泥表现出相似的中间值,但与其他材料相比具有统计学上的显着差异(P <0.05)。即使受光活化的限制或没有光活化,所有测试的双聚合树脂水泥的粘结强度都比磷酸锌水泥高得多,并且产生的结果与化学活化的水泥相似或更好。应当指出的是,这项研究的发现与一个不能模拟临床情况的测试方案有关,需要做进一步的工作来确定所报道的不同诱饵材料之间的拉伸粘合强度差异的临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号