...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of oral rehabilitation >Comparison of visual shade determination and an intra-oral dental colourimeter.
【24h】

Comparison of visual shade determination and an intra-oral dental colourimeter.

机译:视觉阴影测定和口腔内牙齿色度仪的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The choice of correct tooth shade for the fabrication of a restoration remains a challenge, even for experienced clinicians. The aim of this research was to evaluate and compare the precision of two different shade determination methods in terms of repeatability. Maxillary right central incisor of 10 patients was evaluated visually with the use of Vitapan Classical shade guide by five observers and instrumentally with the Vitapan classical shade guide values of ShadeEye NCC intra-oral colourimeter three times consecutively. The in vivo repeatability of methods were analysed with the spectrophotometric L*, a*, b* values of the shade guide (Vitapan Classical). Within the limitations of this study, the repeatability of instrumental (intra-oral dental colourimeter) and visual shade determinations were acceptable.
机译:即使对于有经验的临床医生,为修复体的制造选择正确的牙齿阴影仍然是一个挑战。这项研究的目的是评估和比较两种不同的阴影确定方法在重复性方面的精度。由五位观察者使用Vitapan Classical遮阳指南对10例患者的上颌右中切牙进行了视觉评估,并连续三次使用ShadeEye NCC口腔色度计的Vitapan Classic遮阳指南值进行了仪器评估。方法的体内可重复性用遮光罩(Vitapan Classical)的分光光度法L *,a *,b *值进行分析。在本研究的范围内,仪器(口腔内牙齿色度计)和视觉阴影测定的可重复性是可以接受的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号