...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedic science : >Difference in evaluation of patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for Back Pain and the Japanese Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
【24h】

Difference in evaluation of patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for Back Pain and the Japanese Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

机译:使用日本骨科协会腰痛评分和日语版《 Roland-Morris残疾问卷》评估下腰痛患者的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The number of patients suffering from degenerative diseases in the lumbar spine is increasing in Japan. Although various scales to measure disability or quality of life in patients with low back pain and/or lumbar diseases are currently available, it has been shown that one questionnaire is not always compatible with another. Our purpose is to evaluate the association and differences between the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for low back pain. METHODS: These two scales were examined and compared using data from 602 patients with low back pain and/or lumbar disease. The associations between the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and each subscale in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score in back pain dominant group and leg pain dominant group, and with respect to six pathological conditions (i.e., sciatica, spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, lumbar spinal canal stenosis, muscular pain, traumatic pain) were analyzed. RESULTS: While the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Subjective and Activities of daily living (ADL) subscale of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score showed a good correlation (r > 0.60), the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Clinical subscale showed a weak correlation (r = 0.35). Among the six pathological conditions, the correlation between the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score was the lowest (r = 0.66) in the lumbar spinal canal stenosis category. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical signs in patients with low back pain and/or lumbar diseases are not associated closely with the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Therefore, a combination of the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score can provide wide-ranging assessment of the level of impairment in patients with low back pain and/or lumbar diseases.
机译:背景:在日本,患有腰椎退行性疾病的患者数量正在增加。尽管目前有各种用于测量腰背痛和/或腰椎疾病患者的残疾或生活质量的量表,但已经表明,一种问卷并不总是与另一种兼容。我们的目的是评估日语版《 Roland-Morris残疾问卷》与日本骨科协会针对下腰痛的评分之间的关​​联和差异。方法:使用来自602例下腰痛和/或腰椎疾病患者的数据对这两个量表进行了检查和比较。日文版的《罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷》与日本骨科协会的每个分量表在背痛主导组和腿痛主导组以及六个病理状况(即坐骨神经痛,脊椎病,脊柱滑脱,腰椎)之间的相关性得分椎管狭窄,肌肉疼痛,外伤性疼痛)进行了分析。结果:尽管日语版的《罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷》与日本骨科协会得分的主观和日常生活活动量表(ADL)表现出良好的相关性(r> 0.60),但日语版的《罗兰·莫里斯残疾》问卷和临床量表的相关性较弱(r = 0.35)。在这六种病理状况中,日本版《 Roland-Morris残疾问卷》与日本骨科协会评分之间的相关性在腰椎管狭窄症类别中最低(r = 0.66)。结论:腰背痛和/或腰椎疾病患者的临床体征与日本版《罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷》没有密切关系。因此,日语版的《罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷》和日本骨科协会的评分可以对腰背痛和/或腰椎疾病患者的损伤程度进行广泛的评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号