...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedic science : >Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 3. Validity study and establishment of the measurement scale : Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanes
【24h】

Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 3. Validity study and establishment of the measurement scale : Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanes

机译:日本骨科协会腰痛评估调查表。第3部分。有效性研究和测量量表的建立:日本临床结果委员会下腰痛和宫颈脊髓病评估小组委员会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The Japanese Orthopaedic Association decided to revise the JOA score for low back pain and to develop a new outcome measure. In February 2002, the first survey was performed with a preliminary questionnaire consisting of 60 evaluation items. Based on findings of that survey, 25 items were selected for a draft of the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). The second survey was performed to confirm the reliability of the draft questionnaire. This article further evaluates the validity of this questionnaire and establishes a measurement scale. METHODS: The subjects of this study consisted of 355 patients with low back disorders of any type (201 men, 154 women; mean age 50.7 years). Each patient was asked to fill in a self-administered questionnaire. Superficial validity was checked in terms of the completion rate for filling out the entire questionnaire. Factor analysis was then performed to evaluate the validity of the questionnaire and establish a measurement scale. RESULTS: As a result of the factor analysis, 25 items were categorized into five factors. The factors were named based on the commonality of the items: social function, mental health, lumbar function, walking ability, and low back pain. To establish a measurement scale for each factor, we determined the coefficient for each item so the difference between the maximum factor scores and minimum factor scores was approximately 100. We adjusted the formula so the maximum for each factor score was 100 and the minimum was 0. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the validity of the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire and established a measurement scale.
机译:背景:日本骨科协会决定修订腰痛的JOA评分并制定新的结局指标。在2002年2月,第一次调查是使用包含60个评估项目的初步调查表进行的。根据该调查的结果,选择了25个项目作为JOA腰痛评估调查表(JOABPEQ)的草案。进行第二次调查以确认调查表草案的可靠性。本文进一步评估了该问卷的有效性,并建立了量表。方法:本研究的受试者包括355例任何类型的腰背疾病患者(男性201例,女性154例;平均年龄50.7岁)。要求每位患者填写一份自我管理的调查表。根据填写整个问卷的完成率检查表面有效性。然后进行因子分析以评估问卷的有效性并建立一个测量量表。结果:作为因素分析的结果,将25个项目分为五个因素。这些因素是根据项目的通用性来命名的:社交功能,心理健康,腰椎功能,步行能力和下腰痛。为了建立每个因子的度量标准,我们确定了每个项目的系数,因此最大因子得分和最小因子得分之间的差约为100。我们调整了公式,使每个因子得分的最大值为100,最小值为0结论:我们确认了JOA腰痛评估问卷的有效性,并建立了测量量表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号