首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene >Use of a condensation particle counter and an optical particle counter to assess the number concentration of engineered nanoparticles.
【24h】

Use of a condensation particle counter and an optical particle counter to assess the number concentration of engineered nanoparticles.

机译:使用缩合粒子计数器和光学粒子计数器来评估工程化纳米粒子的浓度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is a need to evaluate nanoparticle (< 100 nm) exposures in occupational settings. However, portable instruments do not size segregate particles in that size range. A proxy method for determining nanoparticle count concentrations involves subtracting counts made with a condensation particle counter (CPC) from those of an optical particle counter/sizer (OPC), resulting in an estimation of very fine However, to determine size distributions from which particles < 100 nm may be estimated, the resulting count of particles < 300 nm can be used as an additional channel of count data in addition to those obtained from the OPC. To test these methods, the very fine number concentrations determined using a CPC and OPC were compared with those from SMPS measurements and were used to verify the accuracy of a very fine particle number concentration determined by an OPC and CPC. Two size-distribution reproduce particle size distributions from OPC and CPC data and were then evaluated relative to their ability to accurately estimate the nanoparticle number concentrations. Various engineered nanoparticles were used to create test aerosols, including titanium dioxide (TiO(2)), silicon dioxide (SiO(2)), and iron oxide (Fe(2)O(3)). These materials were chosen because of their different refractive indices and therefore may be measured differently by the OPC. The count-difference method was able to estimate very fine particle number concentrations with an error between 10.9 to 58.4%. In estimating nanoparticle number concentrations using the size-distribution methods, the log-probit method resulted in the lowest percent errors that ranged from -42% to 1023%. Percent error was lower than the instrument manufacturer's indicated level of accuracy when the test aerosol refractive index was similar to that used for OPC calibration standards. Accuracy could be increased if there was an increase in the size resolution for number concentrations measured by the CPC of very fine particles and mitigation of optical effects.
机译:需要在职业环境中评估纳米颗粒(<100 nm)的暴露量。但是,便携式仪器不会在该尺寸范围内对偏析颗粒进行分级。一种确定纳米颗粒计数浓度的代理方法,涉及从光学颗粒计数器/粒度仪(OPC)的计数中减去冷凝颗粒计数器(CPC)的计数,从而得出非常精细的估算值。可以估计为100 nm,除从OPC获得的那些粒子外,所得的<300 nm粒子计数也可用作计数数据的附加通道。为了测试这些方法,将使用CPC和OPC确定的极细颗粒数浓度与来自SMPS测量的浓度值进行比较,并用于验证通过OPC和CPC测得的极细颗粒数浓度的准确性。从OPC和CPC数据中复制了两个尺寸分布,然后相对于它们准确估计纳米粒子数量浓度的能力进行了评估。各种工程化的纳米颗粒用于创建测试气溶胶,包括二氧化钛(TiO(2)),二氧化硅(SiO(2))和氧化铁(Fe(2)O(3))。选择这些材料是因为它们的折射率不同,因此,OPC可能会对其进行不同的测量。计数差法能够估计非常细的颗粒数浓度,其误差在10.9至58.4%之间。在使用尺寸分布方法估算纳米粒子数浓度时,对数概率法得出的误差百分比最低,范围为-42%至1023%。当测试气溶胶的折射率与用于OPC校准标准的气溶胶折射率相似时,百分比误差低于仪器制造商指示的精度水平。如果提高了非常细颗粒的CPC所测量的数浓度的尺寸分辨率并减轻了光学效应,则可以提高精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号