...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology: the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology >Evaluation of closure versus non-closure of vaginal vault after vaginal hysterectomy.
【24h】

Evaluation of closure versus non-closure of vaginal vault after vaginal hysterectomy.

机译:阴道子宫切除术后阴道穹closure闭合与不闭合的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This randomised prospective study in 53 women having vaginal hysterectomy for benign conditions compared a closed vault technique with an open technique. Twenty-seven had the vault closed (group A) whereas 26 patients had an open vault (group B). The primary outcomes include, vault haematoma (as detected by ultrasound on day 3) and fever. Secondary outcomes are haemorrhage, urinary tract infection, urinary retention and vault granulation tissue. The study did not show any statistical difference between either group. Prolapse of the fallopian tube was recorded in one case in the open vault group. A randomised controlled study on a larger scale is recommended.
机译:这项针对53位因良性疾病而行阴道子宫切除术的女性进行的随机前瞻性研究将闭合穹顶技术与开放技术进行了比较。二十七名患者的穹顶关闭(A组),而26例患者的穹顶打开(B组)。主要结局包括穹ault血肿(在第3天通过超声检测到)和发烧。次要结局是出血,尿路感染,尿retention留和穹ault肉芽组织。该研究在两组之间均未显示任何统计学差异。在开放式金库组中有1例记录了输卵管脱垂。建议进行更大范围的随机对照研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号