首页> 外文期刊>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology >Feasibility of Resectoscopic Operative Hysteroscopy in a UK Outpatient Clinic Using Local Anesthetic and Traditional Reusable Equipment, With Patient Experiences and Comparative Cost Analysis
【24h】

Feasibility of Resectoscopic Operative Hysteroscopy in a UK Outpatient Clinic Using Local Anesthetic and Traditional Reusable Equipment, With Patient Experiences and Comparative Cost Analysis

机译:在英国门诊使用局部麻醉药和传统可重复使用设备进行手术的宫腔镜手术的可行性,以及患者的经验和比较成本分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Objective: To assess procedural success, patient acceptability, and cost-saving potential of operative hysteroscopy using conventional equipment and local anesthetic in an outpatient clinic. Design: Feasibility study/service evaluation (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting: Outpatient (office) clinic in a large UK teaching hospital. Patients: One hundred eighteen women with diagnosed or suspected intrauterine myomas or polyps. Interventions: Operative hysteroscopy (122 monopolar resection procedures using 8- or 10-mm diameter rigid resectoscopes with glycine solution for uterine irrigation) with the patient under local anesthesia in an outpatient (office) clinic. Measurements and Main Results: Procedural success, duration of procedure, pathologic measurements, glycine irrigant deficit, patient pain scores and satisfaction, and comparative costs were recorded. Success of outpatient procedures was 90% (110 of 122 attempted), with a significantly reduced median procedure duration compared with a surgical setting using local (-7 minutes; p = .009) or general (-12.5 minutes; p .001) anesthetic. Glycine irrigant absorption was low (median deficit, 0 mL), and no deficit was observed in 81% of patients. Mean (SD) estimated disease volume was comparable to that of hysteroscopic resection procedures in a surgical setting (3.38 [5.09] cm3), and weight was 1.8 (1.84) g. Patients tolerated the procedure well and reported low pain scores (highest median periprocedure pain measurement was 1.25 of 10), and 7-day follow-up satisfaction responses were positive. Retrospective cost analysis demonstrated that operative resection in an outpatient clinic was less expensive than in a surgical setting using general anesthetic (-$1003) or local anaesthetic (-$234). Reduced staff costs were the primary reason for this saving. Conclusions: Operative hysteroscopic resection of myomas and polyps is feasible and well tolerated by patients in an outpatient/office setting using local anaesthetic and conventional equipment. The outpatient procedure is less expensive and its duration is shorter than in a surgical setting.
机译:研究目的:在门诊中使用常规设备和局部麻醉剂评估手术成功的宫腔镜检查的成功率,患者可接受性以及节省成本的潜力。设计:可行性研究/服务评估(加拿大工作组分类II-3)。地点:英国一家大型教学医院的门诊(办公室)诊所。患者:118名诊断或怀疑宫内肌瘤或息肉的妇女。干预措施:对患者在门诊(办公室)进行局部麻醉的情况下进行手术宫腔镜检查(122例单极切除术,使用直径为8或10毫米的硬性电切镜和甘氨酸溶液进行子宫冲洗)。测量和主要结果:记录手术成功,手术时间,病理学测量,甘氨酸冲洗液缺乏,患者疼痛评分和满意度以及比较成本。门诊手术成功率为90%(尝试过122次中的110次),与采用局部手术(-7分钟; p = .009)或普通手术(-12.5分钟; p <.001)的手术环境相比,中位手术时间显着减少麻药。甘氨酸冲洗液吸收率低(中度赤字,0 mL),在81%的患者中未观察到赤字。在外科手术环境中,平均(SD)估计的疾病体积与宫腔镜切除术的体积相当(3.38 [5.09] cm3),体重为1.8(1.84)g。患者对手术的耐受性良好,并且疼痛评分较低(中位围手术期疼痛最高评分为1.25分,共10分),并且7天的随访满意度反应为阳性。回顾性成本分析表明,与使用全身麻醉药(-$ 1003)或局部麻醉药(-$ 234)的外科手术相比,在门诊诊所进行手术切除的费用更低。降低员工成本是节省费用的主要原因。结论:宫腔镜手术切除肌瘤和息肉是可行的,并且在门诊/办公室环境中使用局部麻醉剂和常规设备对患者具有良好的耐受性。与外科手术相比,门诊手术费用较低,持续时间较短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号