...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology >Medicolegal review of liability risks for gynecologists stemming from lack of training in robot-assisted surgery.
【24h】

Medicolegal review of liability risks for gynecologists stemming from lack of training in robot-assisted surgery.

机译:由于缺乏机器人辅助手术方面的培训,妇科医生对法律责任的风险进行了法律审查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The advances in robot-assisted surgery in gynecology evolved after most practicing gynecologists had already completed residency training. Postgraduate training in new technology for gynecologists in practice is limited. Therefore, gynecologists with insufficient training who perform robot-assisted surgery may potentially be at risk for liability. In addition to the traditional medical negligence claims, plaintiff attorneys are seeking causes of actions for lack of informed consent and negligent credentialing. Thus, it is essential that gynecologists be aware of these potential liability claims that arise in a robot-assisted malpractice suit. This commentary provides an overview of the current medicolegal liability risks originating from lack of training in robotic surgery and seeks to raise awareness of the implications involved in these claims. A better understanding of the doctrine of informed consent and seeking assistance of proctors or experienced co-surgeons early in robotics training are likely to reduce the liability risks for gynecologic surgeons.
机译:在大多数执业的妇科医生已经完成住院医师培训之后,妇科机器人辅助手术的进展就逐渐发展起来。在实践中,对于妇科医生的新技术的研究生培训非常有限。因此,接受过机器人培训的培训不足的妇科医生可能有承担赔偿责任的风险。除了传统的医疗过失索赔外,原告律师还寻求缺乏知情同意和过失证明的诉讼原因。因此,至关重要的是,妇科医生必须意识到在机器人协助的渎职诉讼中产生的这些潜在责任索赔。该评论概述了由于缺乏机器人手术方面的培训而引起的当前法医学责任风险,并试图提高人们对这些索赔所涉含义的认识。更好地了解知情同意原则并尽早在机器人技术培训中寻求检察官或有经验的联合医生的协助,可能会降低妇科外科医生的责任风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号