首页> 外文期刊>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology >Endometrial Cancer After Endometrial Ablation vs Medical Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
【24h】

Endometrial Cancer After Endometrial Ablation vs Medical Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

机译:子宫内膜消融术后子宫内膜癌与子宫出血的医疗处理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Objective: To investigate whether endometrial ablation is associated with increased risk or delayed diagnosis of endometrial cancer compared with medical management of abnormal uterine bleeding. Design: Multi-centered retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: The study was performed using data from The Health Improvement Network, a representative population-based cohort of patients in 495 outpatient general practitioner practices in the United Kingdom. Patients: Women aged >25years with abnormal uterine bleeding diagnosed between June 1994 and September2010. Interventions: Endometrial ablation, medical management, or both. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 234 721 women met study inclusion and exclusion criteria, 4776 of whom underwent endometrial ablation and the remaining 229 945 received medical management. Cox models compared endometrial cancer rates between ablation and medical management groups using hazard ratios. To investigate a possible diagnostic delay, the median time from bleeding diagnosis to endometrial cancer diagnosis in women in whom endometrial cancer developed was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. All statistical tests were 2-tailed, with α=.05. During a median observation period of 4.07years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.88-7.17), endometrial cancer developed in 3 women in the ablation group and 601 women in the medical management group (ablation hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-1.40; p=.17). Median time to diagnosis was 237 in the ablation group, and 299days in the medical management group (ablation IQR, 155-1350; medical management IQR, 144-1133.5; p=.99). Adjusted and sensitivity analyses did not change the results. Conclusions: No difference was observed in endometrial cancer rates, and there was no delay in diagnosis when comparing endometrial ablation vs medical management. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of previous ablation exposure on histology or cancer stage at manifestation of endometrial cancer.
机译:研究目的:与子宫异常出血的药物治疗相比,研究子宫内膜切除术是否与子宫内膜癌的风险增加或诊断延迟有关。设计:多中心回顾性队列研究(加拿大工作组分类II-2)。地点:该研究是使用来自健康改善网络的数据进行的,该网络是英国495个门诊普通科医生实践中具有代表性的基于人群的患者队列。患者:1994年6月至2010年9月之间诊断为子宫出血的年龄大于25岁的女性。干预措施:子宫内膜切除术,药物治疗或两者兼而有之。测量和主要结果:共有234 721名符合研究纳入和排除标准的妇女,其中4776名接受了子宫内膜切除术,其余229 945名接受了医疗管理。 Cox模型使用危险比比较消融组和医疗管理组之间的子宫内膜癌发生率。为了调查可能的诊断延迟,使用Mann-Whitney U检验比较了发生子宫内膜癌的女性从出血诊断到子宫内膜癌诊断的中位时间。所有统计检验均为2尾检验,α= .05。在中位观察期为4.07年(四分位间距[IQR],1.88-7.17),消融组中有3例女性发生子宫内膜癌,医疗管理组中有601例妇女发生了子宫内膜癌(消融危险比为0.45; 95%置信区间, 0.15-1.40; p = .17)。消融组诊断中位时间为237天,医疗管理组为299天(消融IQR,155-1350;医疗管理IQR,144-1133.5; p = .99)。调整后的敏感性分析并没有改变结果。结论:比较子宫内膜切除术与药物治疗之间,子宫内膜癌的发生率没有差异,诊断没有延迟。需要进一步的研究来研究先前的消融暴露对子宫内膜癌表现的组织学或癌分期的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号