...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology >Laparoscopic total hysterectomy vs supracervical hysterectomy: turn, turn, turn.
【24h】

Laparoscopic total hysterectomy vs supracervical hysterectomy: turn, turn, turn.

机译:腹腔镜全子宫切除术与颈上子宫切除术:转弯,转弯,转弯。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hysterectomy is the most commonly performed gynecologic surgical procedure in the United States for nonobstetric indications. The bulk of these procedures will be performed through an abdominal incision (66%), followed by the vaginal route (22%) and a minimally invasive approach (12%) [1]. Most of the readership of The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, I am certain, will agree that use of a laparotomy for treatment of benign uterine disease in two-thirds of women is a true disservice to our patients. The most commonly cited obstacles to the wide adoption of the minimally invasive approach have been the surgical difficulty of and operative time necessary to perform total laparoscopic hysterectomy. For these reasons, many gynecologists are now performing the technically easier and surgically faster laparoscopic supra-cervical hysterectomy to treat benign uterine disease.
机译:子宫切除术是非产科适应症在美国最常用的妇科手术方法。这些手术的大部分将通过腹部切口(66%),阴道途径(22%)和微创方法(12%)进行[1]。我敢肯定,《微创妇科杂志》的大多数读者都会同意,对三分之二的女性使用剖腹手术治疗良性子宫疾病确实对我们的患者不利。广泛采用微创方法的最常见障碍是进行全腹腔镜子宫切除术所需的手术难度和手术时间。由于这些原因,许多妇科医生现在在技术上更容易且手术更快地进行了腹腔镜宫颈上子宫切除术,以治疗良性子宫疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号