首页> 外文期刊>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology >Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial.
【24h】

Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial.

机译:全腹腔镜子宫切除术与全腹子宫切除术治疗良性疾病后的生活质量和手术结局:一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive surgery aims to achieve at least a similar clinical effectiveness with a quicker recovery than traditional open techniques. Although there have been numerous randomized clinical trials comparing laparoscopic hysterectomy with hysterectomy by laparotomy, only a few studies have compared quality of life after different types of hysterectomy. None of these studies evaluated total laparoscopic hysterectomy. In this paper, we report on a randomized comparison of quality of life after total laparoscopic versus total abdominal hysterectomy. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). SETTING: Single-center teaching hospital in The Netherlands. PATIENTS: Patients scheduled for hysterectomy for a benign condition, in whom a vaginal hysterectomy was not possible and laparoscopic hysterectomy was feasible (mobile uterus not exceeding the size of 18 weeks' gestation). INTERVENTIONS: Abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients completed the Dutch version RAND-36 health survey preoperatively as well as at 5 time points in the first 12 weeks after surgery. The primary outcome of the study was quality of life as measured by the RAND-36. A linear mixed model was used for statistical analysis while accounting for baseline values. Secondary outcomes were hospital stay and complications. There were 88 patients eligible, of whom 59 gave consent for randomization. Twenty-seven women were allocated to the laparoscopic arm and 32 to the abdominal arm. We found a significant treatment effect favoring laparoscopic hysterectomy in the RAND-36 scale for vitality. Laparoscopic hysterectomy performed better on all other scales of the RAND-36, but these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hysterectomy results in more postoperative vitality when compared with abdominal hysterectomy. For this reason, all women with a benign condition requiring abdominal hysterectomy, in whom the laparoscopicapproach is feasible, should have the chance to choose laparoscopic hysterectomy.
机译:研究目的:微创手术旨在达到比传统开放技术更快的康复效果,至少达到类似的临床效果。尽管有大量的随机临床试验将腹腔镜子宫切除术与开腹子宫切除术进行比较,但只有少数研究比较了不同类型子宫切除术后的生活质量。这些研究均未评估全腹腔镜子宫切除术。在本文中,我们报告了全腹腔镜与全腹子宫切除术后生活质量的随机比较。设计:随机对照试验(加拿大工作组I级)。地点:荷兰的单中心教学医院。患者:计划进行良性子宫切除术的患者不能进行阴道子宫切除术,而腹腔镜子宫切除术是可行的(活动子宫不超过妊娠18周的大小)。干预措施:腹腔镜与腹腔镜子宫切除术。测量和主要结果:患者在术前以及术后第12周的5个时间点完成了荷兰版RAND-36健康调查。该研究的主要结果是通过RAND-36测量的生活质量。在考虑基线值的同时,将线性混合模型用于统计分析。次要结果是住院时间和并发症。有88位符合条件的患者,其中59位同意随机分组。二十七名妇女被分配到腹腔镜臂,三十二名被分配到腹臂。我们发现在RAND-36量表中,腹腔镜子宫切除术具有显着的治疗效果。腹腔镜子宫切除术在所有其他等级的RAND-36上表现更好,但这些差异在统计学上并不显着。结论:与腹部子宫切除术相比,腹腔镜子宫切除术具有更高的术后活力。因此,所有需要进行腹腔镜子宫切除的良性疾病患者都可以进行腹腔镜子宫切除术,应该有机会选择腹腔镜子宫切除术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号