首页> 外文期刊>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology >Tensile strength of surgical knots performed with the da Vinci surgical robot.
【24h】

Tensile strength of surgical knots performed with the da Vinci surgical robot.

机译:达芬奇手术机器人执行的手术结抗张强度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to estimate the tensile strength of surgical knots made using the da Vinci robot. Four different types of flat square knots (strand-to-strand 4 throw, strand-to-strand 6 throw, loop-to-strand 4 throw, and loop-to-strand 6 throw) were made using the da Vinci-S system by 4 different surgeons, all experienced with the system. For the knots, we used braided polyglactin 910 (Vicryl 2-0). Hand-tied, flat, square, 4-throw strand-to-strand knots were used as reference. The tensile strength was measured for all knots using the Instron 5566 system calibrated to an accuracy of + or - .5% at 4 to 10 newtons (N) and + or - .4% at greater than 10 N. Compared with reference knots, only 1 of 4 surgeons could make knots as equally strong with the robot. For all surgeons, strand-to-strand knots had a significantly higher tensile strength than loop-to-strand knots when made with the robot. Adding 2 throws to the knot did not increase the knots strength in the robot. It is possible to make equally strong surgical knots with the da Vinci robot as by hand; however, despite previous experience with the robot, only 1 of 4 surgeons managed to do so. Adding 2 throws to R4SS and R4LS knots did not increase the tensile strength significantly for any of the 4 surgeons. It is important to train and tie knots using the da Vinci system with the same care as by hand and to be aware of possible differences in knot-tying technique with the robot and manually. With the robot, strand-to-strand knots were stronger than loop-to-strand knots, and should be preferred.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估使用达芬奇机器人制作的手术结的抗张强度。使用da Vinci-S系统制作了四种不同类型的扁平方结(股对股4股,股对股6股,圈对股4股和股对股6股)。由4位不同的外科医生组成,他们都对该系统具有丰富的经验。对于结,我们使用编织的聚乳胶910(Vicryl 2-0)。手工绑扎,扁平,方形,四掷线对线结作为参考。使用Instron 5566系统对所有结的抗张强度进行了测量,该系统在4至10牛顿(N)时的精度校准为+或-.5%,在大于10 N时精度为+或-.4%。与参考结相比, 4名外科医生中只有1名可以用机器人同样强力地打结。对于所有外科医生来说,用机器人制作时,线对结的抗拉强度明显高于环对结的抗拉强度。将2个结点加到结上并不会增加机器人中的结点强度。达芬奇机器人可以进行与手工同样强力的打结;但是,尽管以前有使用机器人的经验,但四名外科医生中只有一名成功做到了。对于4个外科医生中的任何一个,在R4SS和R4LS结上增加2个投掷都不会显着增加抗张强度。重要的是,使用达芬奇系统以手工方式训练和打结,并要注意与机器人和手动打结技术可能存在的差异。使用该机器人,线对结的结点比环线对结的结点更结实,应该优先考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号