首页> 外文期刊>Clinical oncology >Panitumumab monotherapy as a second-line treatment in metastasised colorectal cancer: A single centre experience
【24h】

Panitumumab monotherapy as a second-line treatment in metastasised colorectal cancer: A single centre experience

机译:帕尼单抗单药治疗作为转移性结直肠癌的二线治疗:单中心经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aims: To report our clinical experience of panitumumab monotherapy as a second-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Materials and methods: This retrospective, descriptive study included a series of consecutive patients receiving panitumumab monotherapy (6mg/kg 2 weekly) at a single centre in the Netherlands between June 2009 and November 2011. All patients had wild-type KRAS tumours, had progressed during first-line fluoropyrimidine-based therapy and were not candidates for, or refused, standard second-line therapy (usually irinotecan in the Netherlands). Prophylactic medication was given for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-associated skin toxicities. Results: Thirty-one patients were treated during this period. The most commonly administered first-line mCRC regimen was capecitabine/oxaliplatin/bevacizumab (18/31 patients; 58.1%). Patients received a mean of 7.9 (range 1-18) panitumumab cycles. The median progression-free survival was 3.4 (95% confidence interval 2.4, 4.4) months. The median overall survival estimates were 11.4 (95% confidence interval 1.2, 21.6) months from the initiation of panitumumab monotherapy. Ten patients experienced partial responses according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST; objective response rate: 32.3%); disease was controlled (objective response or stable disease) in 15 patients (48.4%). Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) responses (two consecutive ≥10% decreases from baseline) occurred in 11/29 patients (37.9%); all of whom had >50% decreases in CEA levels. All patients with an objective response at week 12 had CEA reductions at weeks 6 and 12. The only adverse events were grade 1/2 skin toxicities (61.3%) and gastrointestinal complaints (6.5%); three other patients (9.7%) experienced both skin and gastrointestinal complaints. Conclusion: Panitumumab monotherapy seems to be a safe and active second-line treatment for patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC, with activity in line with that seen for irinotecan monotherapy, but with less toxicity. CEA may provide a useful early indicator of response to panitumumab.
机译:目的:报告我们帕尼单抗单药治疗转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的二线治疗的临床经验。资料和方法:这项回顾性描述性研究包括2009年6月至2011年11月在荷兰的一个中心接受连续连续接受panitumumab单药治疗(每周2mg,6mg / kg)的一系列患者。所有患者均患有野生型KRAS肿瘤,已进展在基于一线氟嘧啶的一线治疗中,不是标准二线治疗的候选者或被拒绝(在荷兰通常为伊立替康)。预防药物用于表皮生长因子受体抑制剂相关的皮肤毒性。结果:在此期间共治疗了31例患者。最常用的一线mCRC方案是卡培他滨/奥沙利铂/贝伐单抗(18/31例; 58.1%)。患者平均接受7.9(范围1-18)帕尼单抗周期。中位无进展生存期为3.4(95%置信区间2.4、4.4)个月。自帕尼单抗单药治疗开始以来,中位总体生存估计值为11.4(95%置信区间1.2、21.6)个月。根据实体瘤缓解评估标准(RECIST;客观缓解率:32.3%),有十名患者出现部分缓解。 15位患者(48.4%)的疾病得到了控制(客观反应或疾病稳定)。 11/29患者(37.9%)发生癌胚抗原(CEA)反应(连续两个基线下降≥10%);所有这些人的CEA水平均下降了50%以上。在第12周时有客观反应的所有患者在第6周和第12周时均出现CEA降低。唯一的不良事件是1/2级皮肤毒性(61.3%)和胃肠道不适(6.5%)。其他三名患者(9.7%)经历了皮肤和胃肠道不适。结论:帕尼单抗单药治疗对于野生型KRAS mCRC患者是安全,有效的二线治疗,其活性与伊立替康单药治疗一致,但毒性较小。 CEA可能为帕尼单抗的应答提供有用的早期指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号