...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Microbiological Methods >Comparative analysis of fecal DNA extraction methods with phylogenetic microarray: Effective recovery of bacterial and archaeal DNA using mechanical cell lysis
【24h】

Comparative analysis of fecal DNA extraction methods with phylogenetic microarray: Effective recovery of bacterial and archaeal DNA using mechanical cell lysis

机译:系统进化芯片对粪便DNA提取方法的比较分析:使用机械细胞裂解法有效回收细菌和古细菌DNA

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several different protocols are used for fecal DNA extraction, which is an integral step in all phylogenetic and metagenomic approaches to characterize the highly diverse intestinal ecosystem. We compared four widely used methods, and found their DNA yields to vary up to 35-fold. Bacterial, archaeal and human DNA was quantified by real-time PCR, and a compositional analysis of different extracts was carried out using the Human Intestinal Tract Chip, a 16S rRNA gene-based phylogenetic microarray. The overall microbiota composition was highly similar between the methods in contrast to the profound differences between the subjects (Pearson correlations >0.899 and 0.735, respectively). A detailed comparative analysis of mechanical and enzymatic methods showed that despite their overall similarity, the mechanical cell disruption by repeated bead beating showed the highest bacterial diversity and resulted in significantly improved DNA extraction efficiency of archaea and some bacteria, including Clostridium cluster IV. By applying the mechanical disruption method a high prevalence (67%) of methanogenic archaea was detected in healthy subjects (n = 24), exceeding the typical values reported previously. The assessment of performance differences between different methodologies serves as a concrete step towards the comparison and reliable meta-analysis of the results obtained in different laboratories. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:粪便DNA提取使用了几种不同的方案,这是所有系统发育和宏基因组学方法中表征高度多样的肠道生态系统必不可少的步骤。我们比较了四种广泛使用的方法,发现它们的DNA产量差异高达35倍。通过实时PCR对细菌,古细菌和人类DNA进行定量,并使用人类肠道芯片(基于16S rRNA基因的系统发育微阵列)对不同提取物进行成分分析。与受试者之间的显着差异相比,两种方法之间的总体菌群组成高度相似(皮尔森相关系数分别> 0.899和0.735)。机械和酶促方法的详细比较分析表明,尽管机械方法和酶学方法总体上相似,但反复进行珠子敲打对机械细胞的破坏显示出最高的细菌多样性,并大大提高了古细菌和某些细菌(包括梭状芽孢杆菌群集IV)的DNA提取效率。通过采用机械破坏方法,在健康受试者(n = 24)中检出了甲烷化古菌的高流行率(67%),超过了先前报道的典型值。评估不同方法之间的性能差异是迈向比较和可靠荟萃分析的一个具体步骤,可以对不同实验室获得的结果进行比较。 (C)2010 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号