...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Quality >Relationships between soil physicochemical, microbiological properties, and nutrient release in buffer soils compared to field soils.
【24h】

Relationships between soil physicochemical, microbiological properties, and nutrient release in buffer soils compared to field soils.

机译:与田间土壤相比,缓冲土壤中土壤理化,微生物特性和养分释放之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The retention of nutrients in narrow, vegetated riparian buffer strips (VBS) is uncertain and underlying processes are poorly understood. Evidence suggests that buffer soils are poor at retaining dissolved nutrients, especially phosphorus (P), necessitating management actions if P retention is not to be compromised. We sampled 19 buffer strips and adjacent arable field soils. Differences in nutrient retention between buffer and field soils were determined using a combined assay for release of dissolved P, N, and C forms and particulate P. We then explored these differences in relation to changes in soil bulk density (BD), moisture, organic matter by loss on ignition (OM), and altered microbial diversity using molecular fingerprinting (terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism [TRFLP]). Buffer soils had significantly greater soil OM (89% of sites), moisture content (95%), and water-soluble nutrient concentrations for dissolved organic C (80%), dissolved organic N (80%), dissolved organic P (55%), and soluble reactive P (70%). Buffer soils had consistently smaller bulk densities than field soils. Soil fine particle release was generally greater for field than buffer soils. Significantly smaller soil bulk density in buffer soils than in adjacent fields indicated increased porosity and infiltration in buffers. Bacterial, archaeal, and fungal communities showed altered diversity between the buffer and field soils, with significant relationships with soil BD, moisture, OM, and increased solubility of buffer nutrients. Current soil conditions in VBS appear to be leading to potentially enhanced nutrient leaching via increasing solubility of C, N, and P. Manipulating soil microbial conditions (by management of soil moisture, vegetation type, and cover) may provide options for increasing the buffer storage for key nutrients such as P without increasing leaching to adjacent streams. Copyright Copyright by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.
机译:营养成分在狭窄的无植被河岸缓冲带(VBS)中的保留情况尚不确定,对潜在过程的了解也很少。有证据表明,缓冲土壤很难保留溶解的养分,特别是磷(P),如果不影响磷的保留就必须采取管理措施。我们采样了19条缓冲带和邻近的耕地土壤。使用结合测定释放的溶解态P,N和C形式以及颗粒态P的组合测定来确定缓冲土和田间土壤之间养分保留的差异。然后,我们探索了这些差异与土壤容重(BD),湿度,有机物的变化有关物质因着火而损失(OM),并利用分子指纹(末端限制性片段长度多态性[TRFLP])改变了微生物多样性。缓冲土壤的土壤有机质(89%),水分(95%)和水溶性养分浓度显着提高,其中可溶性有机碳(80%),可溶性有机氮(80%),可溶性有机磷(55%) )和可溶性反应性P(70%)。缓冲土壤的体积密度始终比田间土壤小。田间土壤细颗粒的释放一般要比缓冲土壤大。缓冲土壤中的土壤容重比相邻田间小得多,这表明孔隙度和在缓冲物中的渗透增加。细菌,古细菌和真菌群落显示缓冲液和田间土壤之间的多样性发生了变化,与土壤BD,水分,OM和缓冲液养分的溶解度显着相关。 VBS中当前的土壤条件似乎通过增加C,N和P的溶解度而潜在地增加了养分的淋溶。操纵土壤微生物条件(通过管理土壤水分,植被类型和覆盖率)可能为增加缓冲液存储量提供了选择磷等关键养分,而不会增加向相邻溪流的浸出。版权美国农艺学会,美国作物科学学会和美国土壤科学学会版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号