首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Materials Processing Technology >A comparative study on determination method of heat transfer coefficient using inverse heat transfer and iterative modification
【24h】

A comparative study on determination method of heat transfer coefficient using inverse heat transfer and iterative modification

机译:逆传热与迭代修正法确定传热系数方法的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The distortion control of heat-treated steel parts is a main consideration when dealing with hardening by quenching process. Before implementing this heat treating process, prediction of distortion is necessary to be done by experiment and computer simulation for determining a quenching technique which gives the smaller distortion. Temperature-dependent heat transfer coefficient (HTC) estimated from SUS304 cylinder can be determined by both iterative modification of lumped heat capacity method (LumpHC) and inverse heat transfer method (InvHT). Predicted HTC from silver probe is needed for the LumpHC, whereas initial set of assumption is needed for the InvHT. The zone-based HTC estimated from SUS304 cylinder then is employed on S45C cylinder. The prediction accuracy results from both methods are evaluated. As expected, stir quenching gives less distortion than that of still quenching. More accurate prediction of cooling curves, cooling rate curves, and distortion is achieved by employing the LumpHC than that by the InvHT. All analyses were performed by DEFORM-HT 2D.
机译:热处理钢零件的变形控制是进行淬火硬化处理时的主要考虑因素。在实施该热处理过程之前,必须通过实验和计算机仿真来进行变形预测,以确定产生较小变形的淬火技术。从SUS304气缸估算的温度相关的传热系数(HTC)可以通过集总热容法(LumpHC)和逆传热法(InvHT)的迭代修改来确定。 LumpHC需要使用银探针预测的HTC,而InvHT需要初始的假设集。然后从SUS304气缸估算出的基于区域的HTC应用于S45C气缸。评估两种方法的预测准确性结果。如预期的那样,搅拌淬火比静止淬火产生的变形小。与InvHT相比,使用LumpHC可以更准确地预测冷却曲线,冷却速率曲线和变形。所有分析均通过DEFORM-HT 2D进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号