首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Korean Forestry Society >The Changes in Carbon Stocks and Emissions Assessment of Harvested Wood Products in Korea
【24h】

The Changes in Carbon Stocks and Emissions Assessment of Harvested Wood Products in Korea

机译:韩国伐木产品的碳储量和排放评估的变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study compared and estimated the changes in carbon stocks and emissions of harvested wood products (HWP) by applying FAO statistics and domestic statistics for Korean ,HWP production, import, and export volume, which is almost always supposed tobe included in the carbon emissions and removals inventory by country in negotiations since the 2nd commitment period (2013-2017) of the Kyoto Protocol, for assessing the changes in carbon stocks and emissions of HWP. As a result, when applying FAO statistics to the changes in carbon stocks of HWP as of 2005, stock-change approach (SCA) was estimated at 1.434 Tg C, atmospheric-flow approach (AFA) -1.330 Tg C, and production approach (PA) 0.597 Tg C. When applying Korean statistics, SCA was estimated at1.246 Tg C, AFA -1.520 Tg C, and PA 0.444 Tg C. When applying FAO statistics to CO_2 emissions and removals from HWP, SCA showed a decrease of -5,258 Gg CO_2 (removals), AFA showed an increase of 4,877 Gg CO_2 (emissions), and PA showed a decrease of -2,189 Gg CO_2 (removals). When applying Korean statistics, SCA showed a decrease of -4,569 Gg CO_2 (removals), AFA showed an increase of 5,573 Gg CO_2 (emissions), and PA showed a decrease of -1,628 Gg CO_2 (removals). Therefore, the application of FAO statistics was shown to be more beneficial for the estimation of both the changes in carbon stocks and emissions of HWP by all methods other than that of Korean statistics.
机译:本研究通过应用粮农组织对韩国,HWP生产,进口和出口量的统计数据和国内统计数据,比较并估算了碳蓄积量和砍伐的木材产品(HWP)的排放量,这些排放量几乎总是被认为包括在碳排放量中。自《京都议定书》第二个承诺期(2013-2017年)以来,各国在谈判中的清除清单,以评估碳储存量和HWP的排放量。结果,将粮农组织统计数据应用于2005年HWP的碳储量变化时,库存变化法(SCA)估计为1.434 Tg C,大气流量法(AFA)-1.330 Tg C,生产方法( PA)0.597 TgC。应用韩国统计数据时,SCA估计为1.246 Tg C,AFA -1.520 Tg C和PA 0.444 TgC。当将FAO统计数据应用于H_2的CO_2排放和清除时,SCA减少- 5,258 Gg CO_2(清除),AFA显示增加4,877 Gg CO_2(排放),PA显示减少-2,189 Gg CO_2(清除)。应用韩国统计数据时,SCA显示减少了-4,569 Gg CO_2(清除),AFA显示增加了5,573 Gg CO_2(排放),而PA显示减少了-1,628 Gg CO_2(清除)。因此,事实证明,采用粮农组织统计数据比韩国统计数据更适用于通过所有其他方法估算碳储量和HWP排放量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号