...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of managed care pharmacy : >Cost and utilization of behavioral health medications associated with rescission of an exemption for prior authorization for severe and persistent mental illness in the Vermont Medicaid Program.
【24h】

Cost and utilization of behavioral health medications associated with rescission of an exemption for prior authorization for severe and persistent mental illness in the Vermont Medicaid Program.

机译:行为医疗用药的成本和使用,以及在佛蒙特医疗补助计划中取消对严重和持续性精神疾病的事先许可的豁免。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: In recent years, many state Medicaid programs have implemented preferred drug lists (PDL) to control pharmaceutical costs by generating supplemental rebate revenues and directing providers to the most cost-effective treatments. Two states, Michigan and Vermont, sought approval from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for supplemental rebates for their Medicaid fee-for-service programs in 2002. Behavioral health medications were largely excluded from PDLs and other managed care initiatives implemented by state Medicaid programs because of significant opposition to any impact on this vulnerable implemented the Vermont Health Access Pharmacy Benefit Management Program, a PDL designed to promote cost-effective use of medications. Despite the potential cost savings resulting from implementation of a PDL, behavioral health providers and advocates in the state of Vermont opposed the implementation of the managed care initiative for beneficiaries with severe mental illness, and after January of 2002, Vermont's program was changed to exempt beneficiaries meeting the "severe and persistent mental illness" (SPMI) criteria from prior authorization (PA) for behavioral health medications not on the Medicaid PDL. The SPMI exemption was phased out by June 30, 2006. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of the rescission of the PA exemption on utilization and costs of 3 classes of behavioral health medications (antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anxiolytics/sedatives). Secondary analyses were conducted to assess the association between rescission of the PA exemption and 2 quality measures that might be associated with pharmacy management policy: (a) behavioral health hospitalizations and (b) high-dose prescribing of antipsychotics, defined as dosing that exceeded the manufacturer-recommended maximum dose by 25%. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of pharmacy claims for beneficiaries of the Office of Vermont Health Access Medicaid Program for dates of service from July 1, 2005, through December 31, 2007. The 12-month PA exemption period for 3 categories of drugs (antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anxiolytics/sedatives) was July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006; and the post-PA exemption period was the 12 months from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2007, following rescission of the SPMI exemption. Costs in this analysis were defined as the amount paid by Medicaid, excluding federal drug rebates paid by drug manufacturers and supplemental rebates associated with the PDL program. Costs were adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for medical costs. Frequencies were used to identify trends between medication classes and time periods. Medical claims from the 2 time periods were used to assess inpatient hospitalization trends. Descriptive statistics, Pearson chi-square tests (for categorical data), and t-tests (for continuous data) were used to assess the 2 study cohorts. RESULTS: 17.8% (n=22,130) of 124,169 eligible beneficiaries in the PA exemption period had 1 or more pharmacy claims in the 3 classes of RESEARCH medications exempt from PA versus 19.2% (n=23,717) of 123,499 eligible beneficiaries in the post-PA exemption period. Utilization of behavioral medications per member per month (PMPM) increased by 14.3% from 0.14 claims PMPM in the PA exemption period to 0.16 claims PMPM in the post-PA exemption period, similar to the 14.1% increase in the utilization of nonbehavioral medications (from 0.64 to 0.73 claims PMPM). Utilization changed little between the PA exemption period and the post-PA exemption period for the 3 individual classes of behavioral health drugs, 0.08 claims PMPM versus 0.09 claims PMPM for antidepressants and 0.03 for both study periods for both antipsychotics and anxiolytics/sedative hypnotics. PMPM costs for the 3 drug classes exempt from PA increased by 2.1% from Dollars 12.76 to Dollars 13.03, compared with a 12.2% increase from Dollars 42.58 PMPM to Dollars 47.79 PMPM f
机译:背景:近年来,许多州的医疗补助计划已实施首选药物清单(PDL),以通过产生补充性的退税收入并将提供者引导至最具成本效益的治疗方法来控制药物成本。密歇根州和佛蒙特州这两个州在2002年为其医疗补助收费服务计划寻求医疗保险和医疗补助中心的补充回扣。行为医疗用药在很大程度上被排除在PDL和州医疗补助计划实施的其他管理式医疗措施中由于强烈反对对这个弱势群体的任何影响,实施了“佛蒙特州健康准入药房福利管理计划”,该计划旨在促进以成本效益的方式使用药物。尽管实施PDL可能节省成本,但佛蒙特州的行为健康提供者和倡导者反对实施针对重度精神疾病受益者的管理式护理计划,并且在2002年1月之后,佛蒙特州的计划更改为豁免受益人不符合Medicaid PDL上的行为保健药物的要求,必须满足事先授权(PA)的“严重和持续性精神疾病”(SPMI)标准。 SPMI豁免已于2006年6月30日逐步淘汰。目的:确定撤销PA豁免对3类行为健康药物(抗抑郁药,抗精神病药和抗焦虑药/镇静药)的利用率和成本的影响。进行了二级分析,以评估撤销PA豁免与可能与药房管理政策相关的2种质量指标之间的关联:(a)行为健康住院治疗和(b)高剂量抗精神病药处方,定义为剂量超过制造商建议的最大剂量降低25%。方法:这是一项对佛蒙特州医疗服务补助计划自2005年7月1日至2007年12月31日期服务的受益人的药房索赔的回顾性分析。3类药物的12个月PA豁免期(抗抑郁药,抗精神病药和抗焦虑药/镇静剂)的有效期为2005年7月1日至2006年6月30日;撤销SPMI豁免后,PA后的豁免期限为从2007年1月1日到2007年12月31日的12个月。此分析中的费用定义为Medicaid支付的金额,不包括药品制造商支付的联邦药品回扣和与PDL计划相关的补充回扣。使用医疗费用的消费者价格指数对成本进行了通胀调整。频率用于确定药物类别和时间段之间的趋势。使用这两个时间段的医疗索赔评估住院住院的趋势。描述性统计学,Pearson卡方检验(用于分类数据)和t检验(用于连续数据)用于评估这两个研究队列。结果:在PA豁免期中,在124,169名合格受益人中,有17.8%(n = 22,130)人在3种免于PA的研究药物类别中有1个或更多药房索赔,而在之后的123,499名合格人中,有19.2%(n = 23,717)。 PA免税期。每个人每月行为药物的使用量(PMPM)从PA豁免期的0.14个索赔PMPM增加到PA后免税期的0.16个PMPM,增长14.3%,与非行为药物的利用率增加14.1%(从0.64至0.73表示PMPM)。在3种单独的行为健康药物的PA豁免期与PA豁免期之间的使用变化不大,抗精神病药和抗焦虑药/镇静性催眠药的抗抑郁药的PMPM分别为0.08和0.09,而两个研究期均为0.03。三种免除PA的药品的PMPM费用从12.76美元增加至13.03美元,增幅为2.1%,相比之下,从42.58 PMPM增至47.79 PMPM f增幅为12.2%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号