首页> 外文期刊>Journal of managed care pharmacy : >Benefit restrictions and gout treatment
【24h】

Benefit restrictions and gout treatment

机译:利益限制和痛风治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Gout is a chronic rheumatic disease that can have serious sequelae, including persistent pain, nerve compression, joint destruction and deformities if left untreated. Febuxostat, initially introduced in the United States in 2009, was the first new treatment option for gout in over 40 years. With the introduction of a new drug into a therapeutic class that is composed of generically available options, utilization management will be a common strategy employed in an effort to contain cost; however, the effects of these strategies are not known for chronic gout treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of utilization management strategies on chronic gout treatment. METHODS: This retrospective analysis examined claims data from a large, national pharmacy benefits manager with a client base that includes commercial HMOs, Medicaid, Medicare Part D, and self-insurers. The study population included patients aged 18 years or older who had at least 1 rejected claim for febuxostat in the 16-month identification period from March 1, 2009, through June 30, 2010. Outcomes of interest were the proportion of patients who filled a febuxostat prescription and proportion of patients who filled a prescription for another chronic gout treatment within 1 month of the febuxostat claim rejection date (the index date). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess factors affecting patient response to a rejected febuxostat claim. RESULTS: Of 1,034 patients with rejected febuxostat claims, 95% had claims denied due to utilization management: 36% due to step therapy, 25% due to lack of drug coverage, 18% due to quantity or other limits (i.e., fill limit exceeded, days supply exceeding benefit maximum, or maximum days supply limit exceeded), 16% due to prior authorization requirements, while 5% were due to "other reasons" unrelated to the utilization management strategies of interest. "Other reasons" included over 100 possible rejection reasons such as fill dispensed too soon, missing/invalid days supply, group not having benefit, physician not covered, non-matched group, not a network pharmacy, non-matched member, claim/member birth date not matching, and missing/invalid prescriber identifier. Subsequently, 474 (46%) of these patients filled a febuxostat prescription within 1 month of a rejected claim; 364 (35%) had not filled a prescription for any chronic gout medication within a month of the febuxostat claim rejection. Those filling a febuxostat prescription had higher pre-index total 6-month pharmacy costs than those not filling a chronic gout prescription ($1,718 vs. $988; P < 0.001). They also had a higher number of pre-index drug claims (25 vs. 18; P < 0.001). The regression model found the following variables to be statistically significant in positively influencing the likelihood of patients filling a febuxostat prescription within a month of a febuxostat claim rejection: (a) self-insured coverage (compared with commercial HMO coverage); (b) pre-index total prescription costs of at least $1,800; (c) claim rejection due to quantity or other limit (compared with lack of drug coverage); (d) claim rejection due to "other reason" (compared with lack of drug coverage); and (e) 1 and ≥1 pre-index colchicine claim. Patients with projected febuxostat copay of $100 to $149 were found to be less likely to fill febuxostat compared with patients with a projected copay of $0 to $19. CONCLUSION: Utilization management strategies likely result in gaps in gout treatment; 35% of patients with a denied febuxostat claim in this study population did not fill a prescription for any chronic gout therapy within a month of the claim denial. These findings are important in the consideration of benefit design in gout treatment.
机译:背景:痛风是一种慢性风湿病,如果不及时治疗,会产生严重的后遗症,包括持续的疼痛,神经压迫,关节破坏和畸形。 Febuxostat最早于2009年在美国推出,是40多年来痛风治疗的首个新疗法。随着将新药引入由通用选项组成的治疗类中,利用管理将成为控制成本的通用策略。但是,对于慢性痛风治疗,这些策略的效果尚不清楚。目的:评价利用管理策略在痛风慢性治疗中的作用。方法:这项回顾性分析检查了来自大型国家药房福利经理的理赔数据,其客户群包括商业HMO,Medicaid,Medicare D部分和自保公司。研究人群包括18岁以上的患者,这些患者在2009年3月1日至2010年6月30日的16个月鉴定期内至少有1项拒绝接受非布索坦治疗。感兴趣的结果是填充非布索坦治疗的患者比例处方和在非布索坦索偿拒绝日期(索引日期)的1个月内为另一种慢性痛风疗法开处方的患者的比例。多变量逻辑回归模型用于评估影响患者对非布索坦治疗无效的反应的因素。结果:在1,034名非布索坦治疗申请被拒绝的患者中,有95%的患者由于使用管理而被拒绝:36%由于分步治疗,25%由于缺乏药物覆盖,18%由于数量或其他限制(即超出填充量限制) ,超出最高收益天数或超过最高供应天数的天数),这是由于事先授权要求而产生的,为16%,而5%是由于与感兴趣的利用率管理策略无关的“其他原因”引起的。 “其他原因”包括100多种可能的拒绝原因,例如太早分配了药水,缺少/无效的天数,小组没有福利,医生没有承保,小组不匹配,网络药房不匹配,成员不匹配,索赔/成员出生日期不匹配,并且处方标识符缺失/无效。随后,其中有474名(46%)患者在被拒绝的申请后1个月内服用了非布索坦处方。 364(35%)的患者在非布索坦要求拒绝后一个月内未填写任何慢性痛风药处方。那些使用非布索坦处方的患者与未使用慢性痛风药物的患者相比,索引前6个月的总药房费用更高($ 1,718 vs. $ 988; P <0.001)。他们的索引前药物声明数量也更高(25比18; P <0.001)。回归模型发现以下变量在统计学上显着地影响患者在非布索坦索赔拒绝后一个月内服用非布索坦处方的可能性:(a)自保(与商业HMO承保); (b)索引前处方总费用至少为1,800美元; (c)由于数量或其他限制(与缺乏药物保障相比)而拒绝索赔; (d)由于“其他原因”(与缺乏药物保障相比)要求驳回; (e)1个和≥1个预索引秋水仙碱声明。与预计的共同费用为0至19美元的患者相比,预计非布索坦共同费用为100至149美元的患者补给非布索坦的可能性较小。结论:利用管理策略可能会导致痛风治疗的差距。在这项研究中,有35%的非布索坦治疗要求被拒绝的患者在要求被拒绝的一个月内未填写任何慢性痛风疗法的处方。这些发现对痛风治疗的获益设计很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号