首页> 外文期刊>Journal of managed care pharmacy : >Antiviral regimen complexity index as an independent predictor of sustained virologic response in patients with chronic hepatitis C.
【24h】

Antiviral regimen complexity index as an independent predictor of sustained virologic response in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

机译:抗病毒方案复杂性指数是慢性丙型肝炎患者持续病毒学应答的独立预测因子。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects more than 170 million people worldwide, and one-third of them have human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection. Multiple studies have been conducted in order to identify the factors that may explain different responses to treatment among patients. However, the reasons why HIV-HCV coinfected patients have lower responses to treatment are not clear. In addition, no studies have evaluated the influence of the complexity of the therapeutic regimen for hepatitis C infection on clinical outcomes.?To (a) investigate the influence of the antiviral regimen complexity in the sustained viral response (SVR) in patients with chronic hepatitis and (b) adapt a method of quantifying complexity of an antiretroviral regimen for patients infected with HCV.?A single center, retrospective study was conducted in HCV and HIV-HCV coinfected patients. We selected patients treated with interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin between January 2005 and December 2010. Patients with severe psychiatric disorders, those included in a clinical trial, and those known to be nonadherent to treatment were excluded. The dependent variable was the sustained virologic response and the independent variables were sex, age, race, stage fibrosis (F) ≥2, presence or absence of cirrhosis, low hepatitis C baseline viral load (defined as ≤800,000 IU), viral genotype, rapid virological response (RVR), serum gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels, ratio of alanine aminotransferase to aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST), serum cholesterol level, presence or absence of diabetes mellitus, and antiviral regimen complexity index. The latter variable included drugs for HCV and HIV infection, but no medication for other comorbidities. To evaluate the complexity of antiviral treatment we performed an adaptation of the system developed by Martin et al. (2007) in HIV patients. The factors determining the complexity of treatment were the number of medications, dosing schedules, administration methods, special instructions, and required preparations associated with antiviral regimens. ?Sample size was estimated by the Freeman equation. To determine the independent variables associated with SVR, we performed an univariate logistic regression and subsequently a multivariate analysis with those variables that demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the univariate analysis.?A total of 156 patients was included (76% men, mean age 44 years) of whom 45% were HIV-HCV coinfected. 75% were genotypes 1 or 4. The univariate analysis variables-genotypes 2 and 3 (OR=3.10; CI [1.38-6.95]; P=0.006); HIV-HCV coinfection (OR=0.36; CI [0.19-0.69]); presence of cirrhosis (OR=0.27; CI [0.10-0.73]; P=0,01); F≥2 (OR=0.44; CI [0.23-0.84]; P=0.01); low baseline viral load (OR= 2.05; CI [1.01-4.17]; P=0.048); RVR (OR=17,60; CI [6.84-45.30]; P less than 0.001); complexity index (OR=0.71; CI [0.58-0.87]; P=0.001), showed statistically significant relationships with SVR. Complexity index (OR=0.67; CI [0.52-0.87]; P=0.002) and RVR (OR=20.04; CI [7.33-54.85]; P less than 0.001) were independent predictors of SVR in multivariate analysis. The reliability of the multivariate analysis was checked with the Hosmer and Lemeshow test (P=0.079).?The medication regimen complexity may be a crucial factor to achieve therapeutic success when treating patients for hepatitis C. The adaptation of this index in patients with HCV provides an objective value of the antiviral regimen complexity and could help us to identify patients in clinical practice who require multidisciplinary attention. Simplification of the antiretroviral regimen might result in a greater response to treatment for hepatitis C.?
机译:丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染影响全球超过1.7亿人,其中三分之一患有人免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)合并感染。为了确定可能解释患者之间对治疗的不同反应的因素,已进行了多项研究。但是,尚不清楚HIV-HCV合并感染患者对治疗反应较低的原因。此外,尚无研究评估丙型肝炎感染治疗方案的复杂性对临床结局的影响。为了(a)研究抗病毒方案复杂性对慢性肝炎患者持续病毒应答(SVR)的影响(b)调整量化抗HCV感染者抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的复杂性的方法。对HCV和HIV-HCV合并感染的患者进行了一个中心回顾性研究。我们选择了在2005年1月至2010年12月期间接受干扰素α-2a加利巴韦林治疗的患者。排除了患有严重精神疾病,包括在临床试验中的患者和已知不坚持治疗的患者。因变量是持续的病毒学应答,独立变量是性别,年龄,种族,阶段性纤维化(F)≥2,是否存在肝硬化,丙型肝炎基线病毒载量低(定义为≤800,000IU),病毒基因型,快速病毒学应答(RVR),血清γ-谷氨酰转移酶(GGT)水平,丙氨酸氨基转移酶与天冬氨酸氨基转移酶的比率(ALT / AST),血清胆固醇水平,是否存在糖尿病以及抗病毒方案复杂性指数。后一个变量包括用于HCV和HIV感染的药物,但没有用于其他合并症的药物。为了评估抗病毒治疗的复杂性,我们对Martin等人开发的系统进行了修改。 (2007)在HIV患者中。决定治疗复杂性的因素是药物的数量,给药方案,给药方法,特殊说明以及与抗病毒治疗方案相关的所需制剂。样品大小通过Freeman方程估算。为了确定与SVR相关的自变量,我们进行了单因素Logistic回归分析,随后进行了多变量分析,这些变量证明了单因素分析在统计学上具有显着性差异。共纳入156例患者(76%的男性,平均年龄44岁年),其中45%的人感染了HIV-HCV。 75%是基因型1或4。单变量分析变量-基因型2和3(OR = 3.10; CI [1.38-6.95]; P = 0.006); HIV-HCV合并感染(OR = 0.36; CI [0.19-0.69]);肝硬化的存在(OR = 0.27; CI [0.10-0.73]; P = 0.01); F≥2(OR = 0.44; CI [0.23-0.84]; P = 0.01);低基线病毒载量(OR = 2.05; CI [1.01-4.17]; P = 0.048); RVR(OR = 17,60; CI [6.84-45.30]; P小于0.001);复杂性指数(OR = 0.71; CI [0.58-0.87]; P = 0.001)显示与SVR具有统计学意义。在多变量分析中,复杂性指数(OR = 0.67; CI [0.52-0.87]; P = 0.002)和RVR(OR = 20.04; CI [7.33-54.85]; P小于0.001)是SVR的独立预测因子。多元分析的可靠性通过Hosmer和Lemeshow检验进行了检验(P = 0.079)。药物治疗方案的复杂性可能是治疗丙型肝炎患者取得治疗成功的关键因素。HCV患者对该指标的适应性提供了抗病毒方案复杂性的客观价值,可以帮助我们在临床实践中识别需要多学科关注的患者。简化抗逆转录病毒疗法可能会导致对丙型肝炎治疗的更大反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号