...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of international management >Liabilities of Foreignness Revisited: A Review of Contemporary Studies and Recommendations for Future Research
【24h】

Liabilities of Foreignness Revisited: A Review of Contemporary Studies and Recommendations for Future Research

机译:外国责任的再探讨:当代研究述评和未来研究建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The concept of liabilities of foreignness (LOFs) describes the additional costs that multinational enterprises have to face relative to their indigenous competitors when operating in foreign markets. To date, the special issue of the Journal of International Management (Vol. 8, No. 3) in 2002 contains the only overview of both the state of the literature on this concept and recommendations for further research. A decade later, we examine how the LOFs literature has evolved since this special issue and on that basis provide a critical evaluation of the concept. Specifically, we document the evolution of the field by analyzing drivers and outcomes of LOFs; we also examine how theoretical streams have been applied to the concept, including theories of international expansion, social network theory, institutional theory, and the resource-based view. Comparing the recent literature to what had been recommended as future research avenues in the special issue, we identify areas that either have not been addressed in the meantime (e.g., more theoretical pluralism in interdisciplinary research settings) or have as yet received little attention (e.g., the dynamic perspective of its development and the investigation of LOFs in the context of multinationals from emerging markets). More fundamentally, recent literature in international business also indicates that the concept of LOFs might have been superseded by concepts originating in institutional theory.
机译:外国责任的概念(LOF)描述了跨国企业在国外市场运营时相对于其本地竞争对手所要面对的额外成本。迄今为止,2002年的《国际管理杂志》(第8卷,第3期)的特刊包含有关该概念的文献状态以及进一步研究的建议的唯一概述。十年后,我们研究了自本期特刊以来LOF文献的发展情况,并以此为基础对该概念进行了严格的评估。具体来说,我们通过分析LOF的驱动因素和结果来记录该领域的发展;我们还将研究如何将理论流应用于该概念,包括国际扩张理论,社会网络理论,制度理论以及基于资源的观点。将最近的文献与特刊中建议作为未来研究途径的文献进行比较,我们发现在此期间尚未解决的领域(例如,跨学科研究环境中的理论多元性)或尚未受到关注的领域(例如,其发展的动态视角以及在新兴市场的跨国公司中对LOF的调查)。从根本上说,国际业务方面的最新文献也表明,LOF的概念可能已被制度理论中的概念所取代。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号