首页> 外文期刊>Journal of international development: The journal of the development studies association >MEASURING AND EXPLAINING POVERTY IN SIX AFRICAN COUNTRIES: A LONG-PERIOD APPROACH
【24h】

MEASURING AND EXPLAINING POVERTY IN SIX AFRICAN COUNTRIES: A LONG-PERIOD APPROACH

机译:在六个非洲国家衡量和解释贫困:一种长期方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we create the beginnings of a database on indicators of poverty and deprivation in six African countries over the last 100 years, with the intention of explaining the long-term trend of policy. We argue that an important key to those trends is provided by the decision during the first decades of the twentieth century to allow, or not to allow, the occupation of agricultural land by European settlers. If allowed (as in the white settler - controlled economies of South Africa, Zimbabwe and Kenya, where Africans were squeezed out of income-earning opportunities by competition and prohibition until the 1960s at least) the legacy, we show, was a lack of bargaining power by Africans in the labour market, a real wage static at the subsistence level until late in the century, a highly unequal income distribution, and a small asset base from which to reduce poverty during the liberalisations of the 1980s and 1990s. If forbidden, as in the peasant-export economies of Ghana and Uganda (and to some extent Ethiopia), the legacy was a floor under the labour market, from the 1920s on, which could serve as a basis for poverty-reducing reforms in later years. Thus the potential for poverty reduction during the current 'poverty reduction wave' was indeed determined by the historical inheritance of institutions and policies, in particular settlement policies; but in a quite different way from that adumbrated by the recent analysis of Acemoglu et al. (2001). In their analysis, colonies with a high density of European occupation in colonial times persistently generate higher growth potential in later years; we argue the reverse.
机译:在本文中,我们创建了一个数据库,介绍了过去100年中六个非洲国家的贫困和贫困指标,目的是解释政策的长期趋势。我们认为,这些趋势的一个重要关键是在二十世纪前几十年的决定中提供的,该决定允许或不允许欧洲定居者占领农业用地。我们证明,如果允许的话(如果是白人定居者控制的南非,津巴布韦和肯尼亚,非洲人至少在1960年代之前就通过竞争和禁止从非洲人的赚钱机会中脱颖而出),但这种遗产缺乏讨价还价的余地。非洲人在劳动力市场上的权力,直到本世纪末一直维持在维持生计水平的实际工资,高度不平等的收入分配以及可用于在1980年代和1990年代自由化期间减少贫困的小资产基础。如加纳和乌干达(在一定程度上是埃塞俄比亚)的农民出口经济体中,如果被禁止,则其遗产是1920年代以来劳动力市场的底线,可以作为后来减贫改革的基础年份。因此,在当前的“减贫浪潮”中,减贫的潜力确实取决于制度和政策,特别是定居政策的历史传承。但是与Acemoglu等人最近的分析所强调的完全不同。 (2001)。在他们的分析中,殖民地时期欧洲占领密集的殖民地在以后几年持续产生更高的增长潜力。我们认为相反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号