首页> 外文期刊>Journal of international development: The journal of the development studies association >RETHINKING THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF DEVELOPMENT: BACK TO BASICS AND BEYOND
【24h】

RETHINKING THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF DEVELOPMENT: BACK TO BASICS AND BEYOND

机译:重新思考发展的政治经济:回到基础和超越

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper explores a number of key issues in Development Economics which should be central concerns of contemporary development debates but which rarely attract the attention they deserve. It argues that there were fundamental insights in much of the early theoretical work of the 'first generation' of development economists, including the Latin American structuralists, that remain important. It then discusses the view that much of this earlier work is in danger of being ignored, forgotten or for various ideological reasons, airbrushed out of history. Recent examples include the omission of Latin American structuralism from recent editions of otherwise highly regarded texts, the omission of any reference to Harrod or to Domar in another recently published book which purports to discuss the evolution of growth theory, and a third book focusing on Economic Growth which excludes both Harrod and Domar and gives Arthur Lewis only one mention. The main conclusion is that Development Economics has moved too far away from its core competencies, and that a move 'back to basics' is long overdue.
机译:本文探讨了发展经济学中的许多关键问题,这些问题应该是当代发展辩论的中心问题,但很少引起应有的关注。它认为,在包括拉丁美洲结构主义者在内的发展经济学家的“第一代”早期理论工作中,有许多基本见解仍然很重要。然后讨论的观点是,许多早期工作有被遗忘,遗忘或出于各种意识形态原因而被喷枪淘汰的危险。最近的例子包括:在最近版本的备受赞誉的文本中省略了拉丁美洲的结构主义;在另一本旨在讨论增长理论的演变的新书中,未提及任何有关Harrod或Domar的内容;以及第三本侧重于经济的书。增长不包括哈罗德(Harrod)和多玛(Domar),而亚瑟·刘易斯(Arthur Lewis)仅提及一次。主要结论是,发展经济学已经偏离了其核心竞争力,而且早就应该“回归基础”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号