首页> 外文期刊>Journal of international development: The journal of the development studies association >CONTROVERSIES OVER THE IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENT AID: IT WORKS, IT DOESN'T, IT CAN, BUT THAT DEPENDS ...
【24h】

CONTROVERSIES OVER THE IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENT AID: IT WORKS, IT DOESN'T, IT CAN, BUT THAT DEPENDS ...

机译:关于开发援助的影响的争论:它起作用,不起作用,但可以依靠……

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper surveys five decades of empirical research on the macroeconomic impact of aid, looking mainly at studies examining the link between aid and growth, It argues that studies dating until the late 1990s produced either contradictory or inconclusive results. Aid either worked, or it didn't, according to this research. The paper then highlights a major shift in the literature that coincided with the release of the World Bank's Assessing Aid: What Works, What Doesn't and Why. Practically, all research published since that report agrees with its general finding that aid works to the extent that in its absence, growth would be lower. One controversy may therefore have been settled. Yet, as shown in this paper, the report has set-off an intense debate over the context in which aid works. That debate centres on whether the effectiveness of these inflows depends on the policy regime of recipient countries. Some possible avenues through which the heat might be taken out of this debate are considered.
机译:本文对援助对宏观经济的影响进行了为期五十年的实证研究,主要考察了研究援助与增长之间联系的研究。该研究认为,直到1990年代末的研究要么产生矛盾的结果,要么没有结论性的结果。根据这项研究,援助要么奏效,要么没有奏效。然后,论文强调了与世界银行评估援助发布同时发生的文学方面的重大转变:什么起作用,什么不起作用以及为什么。实际上,自该报告以来发表的所有研究都与它的一般发现一致,即在没有援助的情况下,援助的增长程度会较低。因此,一个争议可能已经解决。但是,如本文所示,该报告引发了关于援助工作背景的激烈辩论。这场辩论集中在这些资金流入的有效性是否取决于受援国的政策制度上。考虑了一些可能从这场辩论中带走热量的途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号