...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of international development: The journal of the development studies association >Consolidation initiatives after land reform: responses to multiple dimensions of land fragmentation in eastern European agriculture
【24h】

Consolidation initiatives after land reform: responses to multiple dimensions of land fragmentation in eastern European agriculture

机译:土地改革后的巩固举措:对东欧农业土地分割的多个层面的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Land consolidation as a means to improve the use of agricultural land has, for centuries, comprised a part of many land reform efforts. Until very recently, the majority of attempts to consolidate land have been large-scale, government-led or promoted by actors who are external to the affected agricultural population, such as International Development Organizations (IOs). A seemingly new wave of land consolidation initiatives is emerging in the wake of agrarian reform in many transition economies as a remedy to the massive constraints imposed on farming by recent land reforms, and as a stop-gap measure in the vacuum of workable land markets. Currently, market-led, demand-driven and participatory approaches to land consolidation are on the IOs long-term agenda, while Eastern European (EE) Governments turn to legislation as a means for promoting a more rational spatial allocation of land. While a valiant effort is currently being made by organizations such as the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) to stress that land consolidation should comprise only one part of an overall rural development strategy, this paper argues that, in the main, the new approaches remain constrained by the same misplaced emphasis on only one dimension of land fragmentation that characterized the former approach. For this reason, efforts to assist the agricultural sectors of many countries are likely to fail. A limited number of studies are emerging highlighting voluntary or spontaneously-evolved efforts to consolidate land at the household level, but, these efforts have failed to find resonance at the macro-policy level. A review of these new arrangements reveals that local consolidation initiatives reflect a response to multiple dimensions of fragmentation.
机译:几个世纪以来,土地整理作为改善农业土地利用的一种手段,是许多土地改革工作的一部分。直到最近,大多数巩固土地的尝试都是由政府主导或由受影响农业人口之外的参与者(例如国际开发组织)大规模实施,由政府主导或推动的。在许多转型经济体进行土地改革之后,似乎出现了新一波的土地整理举措,以弥补最近土地改革对农业造成的巨大制约,并作为可使用土地市场真空中的权宜之计。目前,IO的长期议程是市场主导,需求驱动和参与性的土地合并方法,而东欧(EE)政府则将立法作为促进土地合理空间分配的手段。尽管诸如粮食及农业组织(FAO)之类的组织目前正在做出勇敢的努力,强调土地整理应仅构成总体农村发展战略的一部分,但本文认为,总体而言,新方法仍然存在受到同样放错地方的限制,即只强调土地分割的一个方面,这是前一种方法的特征。因此,协助许多国家农业部门的努力可能会失败。数量有限的研究正在突出强调在家庭层面上巩固土地的自愿或自发发展的努力,但是这些努力未能在宏观政策层面上引起共鸣。对这些新安排的审查表明,地方合并计划反映了对分散化的多个层面的反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号