首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Measuring and modeling maize evapotranspiration under plastic film-mulching condition
【24h】

Measuring and modeling maize evapotranspiration under plastic film-mulching condition

机译:地膜覆盖条件下玉米蒸散量的测量与模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Plastic film-mulching techniques have been widely used over a variety of agricultural crops for saving water and improving yield. Accurate estimation of crop evapotranspiration (ET) under the film-mulching condition is critical for optimizing crop water management. After taking the mulching effect on soil evaporation (Es) into account, our study adjusted the original Shuttleworth-Wallace model (MSW) in estimating maize ET and Es under the film-mulching condition. Maize ET and Es respectively measured by eddy covariance and micro-lysimeter methods during 2007 and 2008 were used to validate the performance of the Penman-Monteith (PM), the original Shuttleworth-Wallace (SW) and the MSW models in arid northwest China. Results indicate that all three models significantly overestimated ET during the initial crop stage in the both years, which may be due to the underestimation of canopy resistance induced by the Jarvis model for the drought stress in the stage. For the entire experimental period, the SW model overestimated half-hourly maize ET by 17% compared with the eddy covariance method (ETEC) and overestimated daily Es by 241% compared with the micro-lysimeter measurements (EL), while the PM model only underestimated daily maize ET by 6%, and the MSW model only underestimated half-hourly maize ET by 2% and Es by 7% during the whole period. Thus the PM and MSW models significantly improved the accuracy against the original SW model and can be used to estimate ET and Es under the film-mulching condition
机译:为了节约用水和提高产量,塑料膜覆盖技术已广泛用于多种农作物。覆膜条件下作物蒸散量的准确估算对于优化作物水分管理至关重要。考虑到覆盖对土壤蒸发的影响后,我们的研究调整了最初的Shuttleworth-Wallace模型(MSW),以估算覆膜条件下的玉米ET和Es。在2007年和2008年分别通过涡度协方差和微溶渗仪方法测量的玉米ET和Es用于验证Penman-Monteith(PM),原始Shuttleworth-Wallace(SW)和MSW模型在西北干旱地区的性能。结果表明,这三个模型都明显高估了这两个年份在作物的初始阶段的ET,这可能是由于Jarvis模型在该时期的干旱胁迫下低估了冠层抗性。在整个实验期间,SW模型与涡度协方差方法(ETEC)相比,半小时玉米ET高估了17%,与微渗漏仪测量法(EL)相比,每日Es高估了241%,而PM模型仅在整个期间,低估每日玉米ET 6%,而MSW模型仅将半小时玉米ET低2%,Es低7%。因此,PM和MSW模型相对于原始SW模型大大提高了精度,可用于在覆膜条件下估算ET和Es

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号