...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of infection and chemotherapy: official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy >Efficacy and safety of levofloxacin in patients with bacterial pneumonia evaluated according to the new 'clinical Evaluation Methods for New Antimicrobial Agents to Treat Respiratory Infections (Second Version)'
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of levofloxacin in patients with bacterial pneumonia evaluated according to the new 'clinical Evaluation Methods for New Antimicrobial Agents to Treat Respiratory Infections (Second Version)'

机译:根据新的“用于治疗呼吸道感染的新型抗菌药物的临床评价方法(第二版)”评估左氧氟沙星对细菌性肺炎的疗效和安全性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The guideline for the "Clinical Evaluation Methods for New Antimicrobial Agents to Treat Respiratory Infections (Second Version)," published by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy in January 2012, was proposed to achieve consistency with FDA guidelines based on the concept of clinical evaluation used in Japan. We assessed the clinical efficacy of levofloxacin (LVFX) in patients with bacterial pneumonia according to this new set of guidelines for the first time. The clinical efficacy of LVFX in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and healthcareassociated pneumonia (HCAP) at the test of cure (TOC) was 87.5% (56/64) and 85.7% (6/7), respectively, with an overall efficacy of 87.3% (62/71). The clinical efficacy of LVFX at TOC was as follows: intravenous 81.5% (22/27), oral 88.9% (24/27), switchover from intravenous to oral administration 100% (10/10), respectively. The bacterial eradication rate in the patients with CAP and HCAP and overall efficacy at the end of therapy (EOT) was 95.3% (41/43), 100.0% (4/4) and 95.7% (45/47), respectively. The frequent causative bacterial strains included Streptococcus pneumoniae (18), Haemophilus influenzae (14) and Moraxella catarrhalis (6). The incidence of adverse reactions in the patients whose safety was evaluated was 15.7% (14/89), similar to that previously reported. The clinical efficacy of LVFX at the early phase, EOT and TOC of CAP, as assessed according to the new and former guidelines, was 70.4% (38/54) and 27.8% (15/54), 87.0% (60/69) and 79.1% (53/67), 87.5% (56/ 64) and 88.1% (59/67), respectively, with no significant differences. Therefore, the new efficacy evaluation method can be used in exchange for the former evaluation method.
机译:日本化学疗法学会于2012年1月发布了“用于治疗呼吸道感染的新型抗菌药物的临床评估方法(第二版)”的指南,旨在实现与FDA指南一致的基础,日本。我们首次根据这套新指南评估了左氧氟沙星(LVFX)在细菌性肺炎患者中的临床疗效。在治愈测试(TOC)中,LVFX在社区获得性肺炎(CAP)和医疗保健相关性肺炎(HCAP)患者中的临床疗效分别为87.5%(56/64)和85.7%(6/7),总体疗效为87.3%(62/71)。 LVFX在TOC的临床疗效如下:分别从静脉给药81.5%(22/27),口服88.9%(24/27),从静脉给药转换为口服100%(10/10)。 CAP和HCAP患者的细菌根除率以及治疗结束时的总体疗效(EOT)分别为95.3%(41/43),100.0%(4/4)和95.7%(45/47)。常见的致病细菌菌株包括肺炎链球菌(18),流感嗜血杆菌(14)和卡他莫拉菌(6)。经安全性评估的患者不良反应发生率为15.7%(14/89),与先前报道的相似。根据新旧指南评估,LVFX在CAP早期,EOT和TOC方面的临床疗效分别为70.4%(38/54)和27.8%(15/54),87.0%(60/69)分别为79.1%(53/67),87.5%(56/64)和88.1%(59/67),无显着差异。因此,可以使用新的功效评估方法来代替以前的评估方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号