首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth: JGR >Paleomagnetic study of Siluro-Devonian volcanic rocks from the central Lachlan Orogen: Implications for the apparent pole wander path of Gondwana
【24h】

Paleomagnetic study of Siluro-Devonian volcanic rocks from the central Lachlan Orogen: Implications for the apparent pole wander path of Gondwana

机译:Lachlan造山带中部的Siluro-Devonian火山岩的古地磁研究:对冈瓦纳表观极游路径的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The apparent pole wander (APW) path for Gondwana is still not clearly established, in particular, for Silurian-Devonian times. A controversial debate places authors who argue for an “X path,” running directly through Africa on a reconstruction of Gondwana against those who advocate a large loop passing by southern South America, the “Y path.” Most of the paleomagnetic data used to draw this loop come from the Lachlan Orogen (Australia). A paleomagnetic study was carried out in the well-dated Ambone and Ural volcanics in the central subprovince of Lachlan Orogen, New South Wales. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility measurements confirms detailed mapping of the region and shows that these massive dacitic sills and/or lava flows are flat lying. Among the different localities studied, only one yields interpretable paleomagnetic results. Two components of magnetization can be identified: a midtemperature direction yielding a corresponding pole in Australian coordinates λ = 67.9°S/ = 084.4°E (B = 5; n = 21; dp = 17.5°/dm = 23.1°) and a high-temperature direction with a corresponding VGP λ = 24.4°S/ = 060.6°E (B = 5; n = 25; dp = 1.4°/dm = 2.5°). The first is interpreted as corresponding to an Early Carboniferous pole position and can be regarded as an overprint probably related to the Early Carboniferous Kanimblan orogenic event. The second does not correspond to any expected Silurian-Devonian or younger pole position. This magnetization is thought to be primary in origin; however, secular variation has apparently not been averaged out in the single lava flow sampled. Therefore the earliest Devonian paleopole position probably lies in a 30° cone around the obtained VGP, and this position can only match the X-type APW path for Gondwana. It is in particular very different from coeval poles obtained in the eastern subprovince of the Lachlan Orogen, and it is mostly used as key poles supporting the Silurian-Devonian loop for the APW path of Gondwana. Therefore some poles from the Lachlan Orogen must be affected by rotation to explain these results. The Lachlan Orogen was hence not stable up to the mid-Paleozoic, and data from this region should not be used as representative for Gondwana.
机译:冈瓦纳的表观极地游走(APW)路径仍未明确建立,特别是在志留纪-德文世纪时期。引发争议的辩论是,主张“ X路径”的作者直接在非洲进行冈瓦纳的重建,反对主张南美洲南部绕过大环路的“ Y路径”的作者。用于绘制此环的大多数古磁数据来自拉克兰造山带(澳大利亚)。在新南威尔士州拉克兰造山带中部的安邦和乌拉尔火山中进行了古地磁研究。磁化率测量值的各向异性证实了该区域的详细绘制,并显示出这些块状的大基岩和/或熔岩流是平坦的。在研究的不同地区中,只有一个产生可解释的古磁结果。可以识别出两个磁化分量:中温方向产生相应的极点,在澳大利亚坐标系中λ= 67.9°S / = 084.4°E(B = 5; n = 21; dp = 17.5°/ dm = 23.1°)和高-温度方向,相应的VGPλ= 24.4°S / = 060.6°E(B = 5; n = 25; dp = 1.4°/ dm = 2.5°)。第一个被解释为与早期石炭纪的极点位置相对应,并且可以被认为是可能与早期石炭纪卡尼姆布兰造山事件有关的叠印。第二个不对应任何预期的志留纪-泥盆纪或更年轻的极点位置。这种磁化被认为是主要的起源。然而,显然在单次熔岩流取样中,长期变化并没有得到平均。因此,最早的泥盆纪古极位置可能位于获得的VGP周围30°的圆锥中,并且该位置只能与冈瓦纳的X型APW路径匹配。它与拉克兰造山带东部地区的同代极极不同,它主要用作贡多瓦纳APW路径支持志留纪-德文尼亚环的关键极。因此,拉赫兰造山带的某些极点必须受到旋转的影响才能解释这些结果。因此,拉克兰造山带一直到古生代中期都不稳定,因此不应使用该地区的数据来代表冈瓦纳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号