...
首页> 外文期刊>Digestion >Low-volume morning-only polyethylene glycol with specially designed test meals versus standard-volume split-dose polyethylene glycol with standard diet for colonoscopy: A prospective, randomized trial
【24h】

Low-volume morning-only polyethylene glycol with specially designed test meals versus standard-volume split-dose polyethylene glycol with standard diet for colonoscopy: A prospective, randomized trial

机译:小剂量早晨专用的聚乙二醇和特殊设计的试验餐,而标准剂量的分剂量聚乙二醇和标准饮食用于结肠镜检查:一项前瞻性,随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/Aims: Split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a standard bowel preparation regimen for colonoscopy, but the large volume is burdensome to ingest and the night dose causes sleep disturbance. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a bowel preparation protocol using low-volume morning-only PEG with specially designed low-residue test meals (LV-PEG with TM) compared to a standard-volume split-dose PEG bowel preparation with a standard diet (SV-PEG with SD). Methods: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, noninferiority study. The primary end point was bowel preparation quality according to the Ottawa scale. Tolerability, compliance, adverse events, sleep quality and polyp/adenoma detection were also assessed. Results: Among 197 patients analyzed (mean age 54.6 years, 51.3% men), 97 received LV-PEG with TM and 100 received SV-PEG with SD. The Ottawa score for the total colon was 3.76 ± 2.07 in the LV-PEG with TM group and 3.67 ± 1.57 in the SV-PEG with SD group (p = 0.723; difference 0.09, 95% confidence interval -0.60 to 0.42). The compliance was high (more than 95%) in both groups (p = 0.621). PEG was easier to ingest for patients in the LV-PEG with TM group compared to the SV-PEG with SD group [visual analogue scale (VAS) for difficulty: 4.64 ± 2.46 vs. 5.97 ± 2.42, respectively; p < 0.001]. Diet instructions were also easier to comply with for patients in the LV-PEG with TM group compared to the SV-PEG with SD group (VAS for difficulty: 3.11 ± 2.25 vs. 4.00 ± 2.39, respectively; p = 0.008). Patients in the LV-PEG with TM group had a lower incidence of abdominal bloating (p = 0.012) and better sleep quality (p < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups regarding polyp and adenoma detection. Conclusions: LV-PEG with TM and SV-PEG with SD have similar efficacy with regard to bowel preparation for colonoscopy. LV-PEG with TM provided easier PEG intake and diet compliance, less abdominal bloating and better sleep quality than SV-PEG with SD.
机译:背景/目的:分剂量聚乙二醇(PEG)是用于结肠镜检查的标准肠道准备方案,但摄入量很大,夜间服用会造成睡眠障碍。进行这项研究以评估使用标准量分剂量PEG肠准备品的低剂量纯早晨PEG和专门设计的低残留测试餐(LV-PEG和TM)相比,肠道准备方案的功效和耐受性使用标准饮食(SV-PEG和SD)。方法:这是一项单中心,前瞻性,随机,研究者盲的非劣效性研究。主要终点是根据渥太华量表的肠准备质量。还评估了耐受性,依从性,不良事件,睡眠质量和息肉/腺瘤检测。结果:在分析的197例患者中(平均年龄54.6岁,男性为51.3%),其中97例接受LV-PEG联合TM治疗,100例接受SV-PEG联合SD治疗。 TM组的LV-PEG总结肠的渥太华得分为SD组的SV-PEG为3.76±2.07,SD组的SV-PEG的总结肠渥太华得分为3.67±1.57(差异0.09,95%置信区间-0.60至0.42)。两组的依从性均较高(超过95%)(p = 0.621)。与具有SD组的SV-PEG相比,具有TM组的LV-PEG患者的PEG摄入更容易[视觉模拟量表(VAS)的难度分别为4.64±2.46和5.97±2.42; p <0.001]。与带有SD组的SV-PEG相比,带有TM组的LV-PEG的患者的饮食说明也更容易遵守(VAS难度:分别为3.11±2.25和4.00±2.39; p = 0.008)。 LV-PEG TM组患者的腹胀发生率较低(p = 0.012),睡眠质量较好(p <0.001)。息肉和腺瘤的检测在两组之间没有差异。结论:带有TM的LV-PEG和带有SD的SV-PEG在肠镜肠准备方面具有相似的功效。与带有SD的SV-PEG相比,带有TM的LV-PEG提供了更容易的PEG摄入和饮食依从性,更少的腹胀和更好的睡眠质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号