首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Histotechnology: An Offical Publication of the National Society for Histotechnology >Loss of samples in the tissue microarray technique: comparison between slides using adhesive tape and silanized slides
【24h】

Loss of samples in the tissue microarray technique: comparison between slides using adhesive tape and silanized slides

机译:组织微阵列技术中样品的损失:使用胶带的载玻片和硅烷化载玻片之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The tissue microarray (TMA) technique allows multiple tissue samples in a single block. Commercial adhesive tape is used to avoid the loss of tissue samples during the immunostaining process. Few reports exist in the literature comparing the use of these adhesive tapes to other adhesive techniques. The objective of this study was to compare loss of sections adhered to slides using commercial adhesive tapes versus using silanized only slides. TMA was constructed' with varying tissues using a fixed-base device (Beecher Instruments), placing 108 cylinders of 1 mm diameter in duplicate, spaced 1.2 mm apart. Section of 4 μm were cut from the TMA block and adhered to 30 silanized slides and 30 commercial glass slides using adhesive tape, according to manufacturer's recommendations. Vimentin immunoexpression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Antigenic recovery was realized in citrate buffer using a microwave oven. Cylinder loss in the immunohistochemical process was quantified and expressed as: total (>80%), almost complete (75-79%), or partial (50-74%). The commercial adhesive tape group presented lesser total loss (1.1 versus 6.4%), almost complete loss (2.2 versus 3.5%), and partial loss (2.1 versus 3.8%) than the silanized slide group (ANOVA, P<0.05). The sum of total and almost complete losses in the silanized slide group was 9.9%, greater than the losses in slides using commercial adhesive tapes (3.3%) and less than reported and considered acceptable in the literature (10-30%). In conclusion, the use of silanized only slides presents very satisfactory results, requires less training, and reduces costs significantly, thus justifying their use in research.
机译:组织微阵列(TMA)技术允许在一个块中包含多个组织样本。商业胶带用于避免免疫染色过程中组织样本的丢失。很少有文献将这些胶带的使用与其他胶带技术进行比较。这项研究的目的是比较使用商业胶带与仅硅烷化的载玻片粘附在载玻片上的切片的损失。使用固定基座设备(Beecher Instruments)用不同的组织构造TMA,将108个直径为1 mm的圆柱体一式两份放置,相距1.2 mm。从TMA块上切下4μm的切片,并根据制造商的建议使用胶带将其粘附到30个硅烷化载玻片和30个商用玻璃载玻片上。通过免疫组织化学评估波形蛋白的免疫表达。使用微波炉在柠檬酸盐缓冲液中实现抗原回收。定量定量免疫组织化学过程中的汽缸损失,并表示为:总计(> 80%),几乎完全(75-79%)或部分(50-74%)。与胶带载玻片组相比,商业胶带组的总损耗(1.1对6.4%),几乎完全损耗(2.2对3.5%)和部分损耗(2.1对3.8%)更低(ANOVA,P <0.05)。硅烷化载玻片组的总损失和几乎完全损失的总和为9.9%,高于使用市售胶带的载玻片的损失(3.3%),并且低于文献报道和认为可接受的损失(10-30%)。总而言之,仅使用硅烷化的载玻片可获得非常令人满意的结果,所需的培训更少,并且显着降低了成本,因此有理由在研究中使用它们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号