...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of gynecologic surgery >Efficacy of Non-Opioid Analgesics on Opioid Consumption for Postoperative Pain Relief After Abdominal Hysterectomy
【24h】

Efficacy of Non-Opioid Analgesics on Opioid Consumption for Postoperative Pain Relief After Abdominal Hysterectomy

机译:非阿片类镇痛药对腹部子宫切除术后阿片类药物消耗对术后疼痛的缓解作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy and pain intensity of and patient's satisfaction with non-opioid analgesics while evaluating postoperative piritramide consumption for providing pain relief after abdominal hysterectomy. Design: This was a randomized, double-blinded study. Materials and Methods: With the patient under general anesthesia, surgery was performed on 120 women using propofol, remifentanil, and muscle relaxant. Four patient groups (n=30 each) were treated over 24 hours with normal saline (NaCl), parecoxib, metamizol, or paracetamol in addition to piritramide using the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Postoperatively, patients were asked every 2 hours for the first 6 hours, and afterwards once every 6 hours, to quantify their pain experience at rest on different pain scales, including patient satisfaction. Cumulative piritramide consumption within 24 hours postoperatively was recorded on the display of the PCA pump. Results: The first required amounts of piritramide in the recovery room were similarly high in all groups and the incremental piritramide consumptions after 6,12 and 24 hours showed no significant difference among the four groups. Also, with cumulative PCA-piritramide consumption no significant difference could be found. In all groups, the highest level of the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was registered upon arrival in the recovery room. However, there was a significant difference only at 6 hours after surgery between the NaCl group and the paracetamol and parecoxib groups. Conclusions: Compared with placebo, there was no significant difference in regard to opioid-sparing effect by administering additional non-opioids, whereas VAS scores were significantly lower in the paracetamol and parecoxib groups at 6 hours after surgery. Any further benefits were marginal and statistically not significant.
机译:目的:本研究旨在比较非阿片类镇痛药的镇痛效果,疼痛强度和患者满意度,同时评估术后吡咯酰胺的使用量以缓解腹部子宫切除术后的疼痛。设计:这是一项随机,双盲研究。材料和方法:对全麻患者,使用丙泊酚,瑞芬太尼和肌肉松弛剂对120名妇女进行手术。四个患者组(每组n = 30)在24小时内使用患者自控镇痛(PCA)泵用吡咯酰胺和生理盐水(NaCl),帕瑞昔布,美他唑或扑热息痛治疗。术后最初的6个小时每2小时要求患者一次,然后每6个小时一次要求患者在不同的疼痛等级(包括患者满意度)上量化他们在静止时的疼痛经历。在PCA泵的显示屏上记录术后24小时内的吡咯酰胺累积消耗量。结果:所有组中恢复室中的吡咯酰胺的首次所需量均相似,并且在6,12和24小时后,吡咯酰胺的增量消耗量在四组之间没有显着差异。同样,使用PCA-吡咯酰胺的累积消耗量也没有发现显着差异。在所有组中,视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分的最高水平都是在到达康复室时记录的。但是,仅在手术后6小时,NaCl组与扑热息痛和parecoxib组之间存在显着差异。结论:与安慰剂相比,通过使用其他非阿片类药物来维持阿片类药物的效果没有显着差异,而扑热息痛和帕瑞昔布组在术后6小时的VAS评分明显更低。任何其他收益都是微不足道的,并且在统计上并不重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号