...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology >Quantitative and qualitative analyses of the clock drawing test in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease: evaluation of a modified scoring system.
【24h】

Quantitative and qualitative analyses of the clock drawing test in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease: evaluation of a modified scoring system.

机译:轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默氏病中的钟表测试的定量和定性分析:改良评分系统的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The clock drawing test (CDT) has been used as a screening tool for identifying cognitive decline in individuals with Alzheimer disease (AD) and other dementias but has not been extensively evaluated for categorizing individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This study used both an established quantitative scoring system and a revised scoring method based on qualitative error criteria developed by Rouleau et al to demonstrate the sensitivity of the CDT to MCI. Participants were 66 cognitively healthy older adult, 33 individuals with MCI, and 33 individuals with AD. Sensitivity analyses of the 2 clock drawing methods revealed that the Modified Rouleau scoring method was more sensitive to MCI than the original Rouleau scoring system. Conceptual, graphic, and spatial-planning difficulties were the most commonly committed errors on the CDT across all groups, and conceptual errors along with graphic difficulties were committed more often in the MCI group than the cognitively healthy control group. Participants in the AD group exhibited greater deficits in all error categories and significantly lower total CDT scores compared to both the MCI and older adult controls. Findings observed in this study suggest that qualitative observations of clock drawing errors can help increase sensitivity of the CDT to MCI and that use of a more detailed scoring system is necessary to differentiate individuals with MCI from cognitively healthy older adults.
机译:钟表测试(CDT)已被用作筛查工具,用于识别阿尔茨海默病(AD)和其他痴呆症患者的认知能力下降,但尚未对轻度认知障碍(MCI)的患者进行分类的广泛评估。这项研究使用了既定的定量评分系统和基于Rouleau等人开发的定性误差标准的修订评分方法,以证明CDT对MCI的敏感性。参与者为66名认知健康的老年人,33名MCI患者和33名AD患者。两种时钟绘图方法的敏感性分析表明,与原始Rouleau评分系统相比,改进的Rouleau评分方法对MCI更为敏感。在所有组中,概念,图形和空间规划方面的困难是CDT上最常见的错误,与认知健康对照组相比,MCI组中更经常发生概念错误以及图形上的困难。与MCI和成年对照组相比,AD组的参与者在所有错误类别中均表现出更大的缺陷,并且CDT总得分显着降低。在这项研究中观察到的发现表明,对钟表绘制错误的定性观察可以帮助提高CDT对MCI的敏感性,并且有必要使用更详细的评分系统来将MCI患者与认知健康的老年人区分开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号