...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology >Ammonia exposure and hazard assessment for selected household cleaning product uses.
【24h】

Ammonia exposure and hazard assessment for selected household cleaning product uses.

机译:选定的家用清洁产品用途的氨暴露和危害评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is scant information pertaining to airborne ammonia exposures from either spills or common household uses of ammonia-containing floor and tile cleaners or from spray-on glass cleaners. We assessed instantaneous and event-specific time-weighted average (TWA) exposures to airborne ammonia during spills and use (per label directions) of a household floor and tile cleaner and two spray-on window cleaners. Airborne ammonia levels measured at breathing zone height (BZH) above the spilled floor and tile cleaner product reached 500 p.p.m. within 5 min, while levels for spilled window cleaner were below 8 p.p.m. TWA exposures were assessed while tile walls and floors were cleaned in three different bathrooms of a residence, and during use of a spray-on glass cleaner while washing several large windows in an office setting. NIOSH Method 6015 was utilized with concurrent field measurements every 60 s using a Drager PAC III monitor with an electrochemical cell detector. Peak ammonia levels ranged from 16 to 28 p.p.m. and short-term TWA concentrations ranged from 9.4 to 13 p.p.m. during mixing (0.1% ammonia) and cleaning tiles in the three bathrooms. Ammonia exposures while using spray-on window cleaner were over 10-fold lower (TWA=0.65 p.p.m.). Use of the floor and tile cleaner mixed at 0.2% ammonia led to peak airborne ammonia levels within 3-5 min at 36-90 p.p.m., and use of full strength cleaner (3% ammonia) led to peak ammonia levels of 125 to >200 p.p.m. within 2-3 min. Spillage or intentional use of the full strength floor and tile cleaner led to airborne ammonia concentrations that exceed occupational short-term exposure limits, while spillage or use of the spray-on window cleaner did not approach potentially hazardous airborne ammonia levels and likely represents a minimal inhalation health hazard. We conclude that routine household uses of ammonia are unlikely to produce significant exposures when using standard cleaning solutions (0.1-0.2%), but spillage or use of concentrated ammonia solutions (e.g., 3%) in poorly ventilated areas can lead to potentially hazardous airborne ammonia exposures.
机译:很少有关于空气传播的氨气暴露的信息,这些信息是由于溢出或家用含氨地板清洁剂或瓷砖清洁剂或喷涂玻璃清洁剂引起的。我们评估了家用地板和瓷砖清洁剂以及两个喷淋式窗户清洁剂溢出和使用(按照标签说明)期间瞬时和特定于事件的时间加权平均值(TWA)暴露于空气中的氨。在溢出地面和瓷砖清洁剂产品上方呼吸区高度(BZH)处测得的空气中氨含量达到500 p.p.m.在5分钟内,而洒下的窗户清洁剂的水平低于晚上8点。在住宅的三个不同浴室中清洁瓷砖墙壁和地板时,以及在使用喷雾玻璃清洁剂并在办公室环境中清洗几扇大窗户的过程中,评估了TWA暴露。 NIOSH方法6015与带有电化学电池检测器的Drager PAC III监测器每60 s同时进行一次现场测量。氨峰值浓度为16至28 p.p.m.和短期TWA浓度范围为9.4至13 p.p.m.在混合(0.1%氨水)期间清洁三个浴室中的瓷砖。使用喷涂式窗户清洁剂时氨气暴露量降低了10倍以上(TWA = 0.65 p.p.m.)。使用混合了0.2%氨水的地板和瓷砖清洁剂会在3-5分钟内达到36-90 ppm的空气中氨含量峰值,而使用全强度清洁剂(3%氨水)会导致125-> 200的氨含量峰值百万分之几2-3分钟内溢出或故意使用全强度地板和瓷砖清洁剂会导致空气中的氨气浓度超过职业短期暴露极限,而溢出或使用喷涂式窗户清洁剂并未达到潜在的危险性空气中氨气含量,并且可能表示最低水平吸入危害健康。我们得出的结论是,在使用标准清洁溶液(0.1-0.2%)的情况下,常规家庭氨气的使用不太可能产生大量暴露,但是在通风不良的区域中洒出或使用浓氨水溶液(例如3%)会导致潜在的空气传播危险氨暴露。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号