...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geochemical Exploration: Journal of the Association of Exploration Geochemists >A comparative study of independent component analysis with principal component analysis in geological objects identification, Part I: Simulations
【24h】

A comparative study of independent component analysis with principal component analysis in geological objects identification, Part I: Simulations

机译:地质目标识别中独立成分分析与主成分分析的比较研究,第一部分:模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Independent component analysis (ICA) and principal component analysis (PCA) are two multivariate statistical methods that convert a set of observed input correlated variables into independent or uncorrelated components which are combinations of the observed variables. The former has been commonly applied in geochemical data analysis for mineral exploration, while the latter has not been explored well enough. Here, in Part I of two sister papers, we will compare the theories of ICA and PCA in order to show how these methods should be applied in geochemical data analysis for geological interpretation and geo-object characterization. In Part II we will apply both PCA and ICA for mapping geological lithological units on the basis of a stream sediment geochemical dataset in Pinghe, Fujian, Southern China. First, we elucidate that independent components (ICs) determined by maximization of nongaussianity characterize diverse geo-objects while principal components (PCs) obtained on the basis of decreasingly dominant variance or variability reflect major geo-objects. The former generate nongaussian ICs, whereas the latter create maximum variance PCs. Since the principles of these two methods are different they should be applied complementarily for processing geochemical data. The differences between these two methods are further demonstrated by geochemical data of various rock types generated by Monte Carlo simulation. The results show that according to the Kullback-Leibler divergence criterion the components obtained using ICA depict more diverged distribution of rocks, even when the rocks have similar average element concentrations. On the other hand, PCs show more diverged distribution of rocks with significantly different average element concentrations. In part II, these two methods are applied to mapping geological lithological units on the basis of a stream sediment geochemical dataset in Pinghe, Fujian, Southern China. The results show that due to specific geochemical signatures of different geo-objects, both ICs and PCs can be potentially utilized to extract geological meaning and characterize geo-objects. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:独立成分分析(ICA)和主成分分析(PCA)是两种多元统计方法,可将一组观察到的输入相关变量转换为独立或不相关的成分,这些成分是观察变量的组合。前者通常被用于矿物勘探的地球化学数据分析中,而后者却没有得到很好的勘探。在这里,在两篇姊妹论文的第一部分中,我们将比较ICA和PCA的理论,以说明如何将这些方法应用于地球化学数据分析中以进行地质解释和地物表征。在第二部分中,我们将基于中国南方福建省平和县的河流沉积物地球化学数据集,将PCA和ICA应用于地质岩性单位制图。首先,我们阐明了由非高斯性最大化确定的独立成分(IC)表征了各种地理对象,而基于递减主导方差或变异性获得的主成分(PC)则反映了主要地理对象。前者产生非高斯IC,而后者产生最大方差PC。由于这两种方法的原理不同,因此应将其互补地用于处理地球化学数据。蒙特卡罗模拟产生的各种岩石类型的地球化学数据进一步证明了这两种方法之间的差异。结果表明,根据Kullback-Leibler散度准则,即使当岩石具有相似的平均元素浓度时,使用ICA所获得的成分仍能显示出更大的岩石分布。另一方面,PC显示出平均元素浓度明显不同的岩石分布更加分散。在第二部分中,这两种方法基于中国南部福建省平和县的河流沉积物地球化学数据集,被用于绘制地质岩性单元的图。结果表明,由于不同地理对象的特定地球化学特征,IC和PC都可以潜在地用于提取地质意义和表征地理对象。 (C)2014 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号