...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical kidney journal >Arterio-venous fistula buttonhole cannulation technique: A retrospective analysis of infectious complications
【24h】

Arterio-venous fistula buttonhole cannulation technique: A retrospective analysis of infectious complications

机译:动静脉瘘纽孔插管技术:感染并发症的回顾性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundThere are two main methods of accessing arterio-venous fistulas (AVFs); the 'buttonhole' and the 'rope-ladder' cannulation technique. Several small studies have hypothesized that the buttonhole technique is associated with increased rates of fistula-associated infection. This study addresses this hypothesis.MethodsA retrospective review of all patients attending a large outpatient haemodialysis clinic was performed. Data were collected on the method of cannulation, infection rates, implicated microorganisms, complications of infection and time on haemodialysis.ResultsA total of 127 patients had received haemodialysis via an AVF: 53 via the rope-ladder technique and 74 via the buttonhole technique. Nine episodes of clinically significant bacteraemia were recorded in the buttonhole group. This equated to a rate of 0.073 bacteraemia events per 1000 AVF days. There were no episodes of bacteraemia in the rope-ladder group. Eight infections were due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA); one was due to Staphylococcus epidermidis. Three patients with MSSA bacteraemia subsequently developed infective endocarditis. Five patients who developed bacteraemia events had been undergoing home haemodialysis.ConclusionsThis study highlights the infectious complications associated with buttonhole cannulation techniques. All organisms isolated in our cohort were known skin colonizers. The reason for the increased rates of infection is unclear. Given this high rate of often life-threatening infection, we recommend regular audit of infection rates. We currently do not recommend this technique to our patients receiving haemodialysis.
机译:背景技术有两种主要的动静脉瘘(AVF)治​​疗方法。 “锁眼”和“梯形”插管技术。一些小型研究假设扣眼技术与瘘管相关感染的发生率增加有关。方法对所有就诊于大型门诊血液透析诊所的患者进行回顾性回顾。收集有关插管方法,感染率,所涉及的微生物,感染并发症和血液透析时间的数据。结果共有127例患者通过AVF接受了血液透析:通过绳梯技术进行了53例,通过纽孔技术进行了74例。扣眼组记录了9次具有临床意义的菌血症发作。这等于每1000 AVF天发生0.073菌血症事件的发生率。绳梯组没有细菌血症发作。八次感染是由于对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA);一是由于表皮葡萄球菌。三名MSSA菌血症患者随后发生了感染性心内膜炎。五名发生菌血症事件的患者已经接受了家庭血液透析。结论本研究强调了与扣眼插管技术相关的感染并发症。我们队列中分离出的所有生物都是已知的皮肤定植者。感染率增加的原因尚不清楚。鉴于这种威胁生命的高发病率,我们建议定期检查感染率。我们目前不建议该技术用于接受血液透析的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号