首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
【24h】

The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.

机译:使用手动和旋转器械根据最初的根尖锉尺寸,根据具体的扩大标准,准备根尖管的质量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the quality of apical enlargement of mesiobuccal canals of mandibular molars using conventional stainless steel hand files (K files) and nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) rotary instruments (LightSpeed). Thirty freshly extracted mandibular molars were randomly assigned to three equal groups (n = 10 each group). The mesiobuccal canals were instrumented with K file using step-back technique without coronal flaring (control; group 1), K file using step-back technique after coronal flaring (group 2), and LightSpeed instrumentation (group 3). Specific criteria for apical enlargement based on initial apical size were used. For step-back techniques, the master apical file sizes were based on the Grossman criterion of three sizes larger than the first file that bound at working length, without coronal flaring (group 1) and with flaring (group 2). For the LightSpeed (LS) group, the master apical rotary sizes were based on the manufacturer's recommendation. Canal cleanliness, canal transportation, and final canal shapes were determined histologically at 1-mm and 3-mm levels short of the working length. Canals were prepared to significantly larger sizes using LS instrumentation than with either hand instrumentation techniques (15-17 ISO units, p < 0.001). LS instrumentation allowed greater apical enlargement with significantly cleaner canals, less apical transportation, and better canal shape than both hand instrumentation groups at both levels (p < 0.05). None of the three techniques was totally effective in cleaning the apical canal space. It was concluded that greater apical enlargement using LS rotary instruments is beneficial as an attempt to further debride the apical third region in mesiobuccal canals of mandibular molars. Instrument designs, alloy properties, and canal curvature are important factors that determine the feasibility of greater apical enlargement in narrow canals.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较使用常规不锈钢手动锉(K锉)和镍钛(Ni-Ti)旋转器械(LightSpeed)的下颌磨牙近颊颊管根尖扩大的质量。将30颗新鲜提取的下颌磨牙随机分为三组(每组n = 10)。用无冠状扩口的后退技术用K锉器械近中颊管(对照组;第1组),用冠状扩口后的后退技术用K锉器械(第2组)和LightSpeed器械(第3组)器械。使用基于初始根尖大小的根尖增大的特定标准。对于后退技术,主要的根尖锉尺寸基于Grossman准则,该尺寸比以工作长度约束的第一个锉尺寸大三个尺寸,没有冠状扩张(第1组)和有扩张(第2组)。对于LightSpeed(LS)组,主根尖旋转尺寸基于制造商的建议。从组织学角度确定在距工作长度不足1毫米和3毫米的水平下进行运河清洁度,运河运输和最终运河形状。与使用任何一种手动器械技术相比,使用LS器械将运河准备成明显更大的尺寸(15-17 ISO单位,p <0.001)。 LS器械在两个水平上均比两个手持器械组允许更大的根尖扩张,并具有明显更清洁的根管,更少的根尖运输和更好的根管形状(p <0.05)。三种技术都不能完全有效地清洁根尖管空间。结论是,使用LS旋转器械进行更大的根尖扩大是有益的,因为它试图进一步清创下颌磨牙近颊颊管的根尖第三区域。器械的设计,合金特性和管曲率是决定在狭窄的根管内进行更大的根尖扩大可行性的重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号