首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >The Effect of Canal Preparation on Fill Length in Straight Root Canals Obturated with GuttaCore
【24h】

The Effect of Canal Preparation on Fill Length in Straight Root Canals Obturated with GuttaCore

机译:根管预备对根管充填的直根管充填长度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: A common critique of using thermoplasticized carrier-based obturators is the incidence of overextension. It would be of benefit to clinicians to have a technique for canal preparation that would allow for predictable length control. This study compared straight canals instrumented to a size 40 file using a 0.04 standardized taper preparation (SIP) and a varied taper preparation (VTP) by evaluating the extension of GuttaCore (GC) obturators (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK). Methods: Eighty extracted mature human premolars with single straight canals were randomly divided into 2 experimental groups (n = 40). The STP group was instrumented to size 40/.04 'at the working length (WL). The VTP group was instrumented to size 40/.02 at the WL. Both groups were obturated with a size 40 GC obturator. Extension of the material, in relation to the WL, was evaluated and assessed Ordinally. Statistically significant differences were determined by a 2-group chisquare test with a 2-sided P value set at P = .05 and a Fisher exact test of equal proportions. Results: Significant differences in extrusion existed between the STP and VIP groups when controlling for the type of apical preparation (P = .0005). The SIP group resulted in a 47.2% incidence of overextension, whereas the VTP group resulted in 10.5% overextension of obturating material. Conclusions: The results indicate that when filling straight canals with GC obturators the canal can be instrumented using a varied tapered canal preparation with a low likelihood of overexterision.
机译:简介:使用热塑性的基于载体的封闭器的普遍批评是过度伸展的发生。对于临床医生而言,拥有一种可以进行可预测的长度控制的根管准备技术将是有益的。这项研究通过评估GuttaCore(GC)闭孔器(Dentsply Tulsa Dental,Tulsa,OK)的延伸率,比较了使用0.04标准化锥度准备(SIP)和不同锥度准备(VTP)的大小为40锉的直管。方法:将八十只提取的具有单条直管的成熟人前磨牙随机分为2个实验组(n = 40)。 STP组在工作长度(WL)时的尺寸为40 / .04'。在WL,VTP组的大小为40 / .02。两组均用40 GC封闭器封闭。通常,评估和评估与WL有关的材料扩展。统计学上的显着性差异是通过2组卡方检验确定的,其中2面P值设置为P = 0.05,Fisher精确检验的比例相同。结果:控制根尖准备的类型时,STP组和VIP组之间在挤压方面存在显着差异(P = .0005)。 SIP组导致过度扩张的发生率为47.2%,而VTP组导致闭塞性物质的过度扩张为10.5%。结论:结果表明,当用GC充填器填充直管时,可以使用变化多样的锥形管制备器械,但用力过度的可能性很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号