首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in a double (S-shaped) simulated curvature
【24h】

Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in a double (S-shaped) simulated curvature

机译:镍钛旋转器械在双(S形)模拟曲率下的循环疲劳

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: The goal of the present study was to test the fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary files in a double curvature (S-shaped) artificial root canal and to compare those results with single curvature artificial root canals. Methods: Two nickel-titanium endodontic instruments consisting of identical instrument sizes (constant.06 taper and 0.25 tip diameter) were tested, ProFile instruments and Vortex instruments. Both instruments were tested for fatigue inside an artificial canal with a double curvature and inside a curved artificial canal with a single curvature. Ten instruments for each group were tested to fracture in continuous rotary motion at 300 rpm. Number of cycles to failure (NCF) was calculated to the nearest whole number, and the length of the fractured fragment was measured in millimeters. Data were statistically analyzed with a level of significance set at 95% confidence level. Results: The NCF value was always statistically lower in the double curved artificial canal when compared with the single curve (P <.05) in both the apical and coronal curvatures. Statistically significant differences (P <.05) were noted between instruments of the same size of different brand only in the single curve; ProFile registered a mean of 633.5 ± 75.1 NCF, whereas Vortex registered a mean of 548 ± 48.9 NCF. Conclusions: Regardless of the differences between the instruments used in the present study, the results suggest that the more complex is the root canal, the more adverse are the effects on the cyclic fatigue resistance of the instruments.
机译:简介:本研究的目的是在双曲率(S形)人工根管中测试镍钛旋转锉的耐疲劳性,并将这些结果与单曲率人工根管进行比较。方法:测试了两种镍钛牙髓器械,分别使用相同的器械尺寸(恒定的06锥度和0.25的尖端直径),ProFile器械和Vortex器械。两种仪器均经过双曲率人工运河内和单曲率弯曲人工运河内的疲劳测试。每组测试十个器械以300 rpm的连续旋转速度断裂。计算出失效循环数(NCF)至最接近的整数,并以毫米为单位测量断裂片段的长度。对数据进行统计分析,显着性水平设置为95%置信水平。结果:与根尖弯曲和冠状弯曲相比,双弯曲人工管的NCF值在统计学上始终低于单弯曲(P <.05)。仅在一条曲线上,在不同品牌的相同尺寸的乐器之间发现了统计学上的显着差异(P <.05); ProFile记录的平均值为633.5±75.1 NCF,而Vortex记录的平均值为548±48.9 NCF。结论:不管本研究中使用的器械之间的差异如何,结果均表明,根管越复杂,对器械的抗循环疲劳性的影响就越大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号