首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Evaluation of microleakage of roots filled with different techniques with a computerized fluid filtration technique.
【24h】

Evaluation of microleakage of roots filled with different techniques with a computerized fluid filtration technique.

机译:用计算机流体过滤技术评估用不同技术填充的根的微渗漏。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the apical leakage of roots filled with different materials using a computerized fluid filtration technique. There were 36 freshly extracted human maxillary central incisors selected. After preparation and irrigation, 3 experimental groups of 10 roots were constituted. Ten roots were filled with AH Plus and gutta-percha, 10 roots were filled with Sealapex and gutta-percha, and 10 roots were filled with Epiphany sealer and Resilon cone using a single cone technique. Three roots were used as a positive control and three roots were used as a negative control group. Evaluation of the apical leakages was performed with a computerized fluid filtration technique. According to the results, the difference between group 3 and 1 and group 3 and 2 was statistically significant (p<0.05). Although group 2 leaked the most, there was no significant difference between group 1 and 2.
机译:这项研究的目的是使用计算机流体过滤技术比较填充有不同材料的根的根尖泄漏情况。选择了36个新鲜提取的人上颌中切牙。经过准备和灌溉后,组成了10个根的3个实验组。十个根用AH Plus和古塔胶填充,十个根用Sealapex和古塔胶填充,而十个根使用单锥技术填充主显密封剂和Resilon锥。三根用作阳性对照,三根用作阴性对照组。用计算机流体过滤技术进行根尖漏泄的评估。根据结果​​,第3组和第1组与第3组和第2组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p <0.05)。尽管第2组泄漏最多,但第1组和第2组之间没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号