首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting in patients with hostile anatomy: the multi-wire technique.
【24h】

Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting in patients with hostile anatomy: the multi-wire technique.

机译:敌对解剖患者的颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术:多线技术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To describe the multi-wire technique that facilitates cannulation of the carotid artery during angioplasty and stenting in patients with difficult neck anatomy. TECHNIQUE: When cannulation of the common carotid artery (CCA) was not effective with a 5-F diagnostic mammary artery catheter and standard single-wire technique, a 0.035-inch hydrophilic guidewire was advanced into the external carotid artery (ECA) with the aid of the road map technique and 6-mL injections of contrast. The catheter was exchanged for an 8-F MPA guiding catheter. If the first attempt to advance the guide catheter failed, an additional 2 or 3 hydrophilic guidewires were placed within the ECA to advance the guiding catheter to the CCA, paving the way for carotid angioplasty. Of 140 patients referred to our center with hostile neck anatomies, this technique had been employed in 30 (21%) patients (26 men; mean age 78+/-6 years): 15 (50%) had type III aortic arch, 7 (23%) had severe tortuosity of the CCA, and 8 (27%) had angulated takeoffs of the carotid or internal arteries. The 2-wire technique was used in 17 patients, 3 wires in 9 patients, and 4 wires in 4 patients. Successful cannulation and correct stent deployment were achieved in all patients. Fluoroscopy time was longer in hostile neck patients compared with others (7.2+/-3.1 versus 3.8+/-2.3 minutes, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The multi-wire techniques appear to be a safe and effective method to aid cannulation and angioplasty of carotid arteries in patients with hostile neck anatomy.
机译:目的:描述多线技术,该技术可在颈部解剖困难的患者中在血管成形术和支架置入过程中促进颈动脉插管。技术:当使用5-F诊断性乳腺动脉导管和标准单线技术对颈总动脉(CCA)插管无效时,可借助0.035英寸亲水性导丝进入颈外动脉(ECA)路线图技术和6毫升的对比注射液。将该导管更换为8-F MPA引导导管。如果首次推进导管的尝试失败,则将另外的2或3条亲水性导丝放置在ECA中,以将导管推进到CCA,为颈动脉血管成形术铺平道路。在转诊至我们中心的具有敌对颈部解剖结构的140例患者中,此技术已用于30例(21%)患者(26名男性;平均年龄78 +/- 6岁):15例(50%)具有III型主动脉弓,7 (23%)的CCA呈曲折性,而8(27%)的患者的颈动脉或内动脉成角度弯曲。 2线技术用于17例患者,3线用于9例患者,4线用于4例患者。所有患者均成功插管并正确部署了支架。与其他人相比,敌对颈部患者的荧光检查时间更长(7.2 +/- 3.1分钟对3.8 +/- 2.3分钟,p <0.01)。结论:多线技术似乎是一种安全有效的方法,可帮助对敌对颈部解剖结构的患者进行颈动脉插管和血管成形术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号