...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology >Seasonal and Synoptic Variations In Near-Surface Air Temperature Lapse Rates In a Mountainous
【24h】

Seasonal and Synoptic Variations In Near-Surface Air Temperature Lapse Rates In a Mountainous

机译:山区近地表气温流失率的季节性和天气变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To accurately estimate near-surface (2 m) air temperatures in a mountainous region for hydroiogic prediction models and other investigations of environmental processes, the authors evaluated daily and seasonal variations (with the consideration of different weather types) of surface air temperature lapse rates at a spatial scale of 10 000 km~2 in south-central Idaho. Near-surface air temperature data (T_(max), and (T_(avg)) from 14 meteorological stations were used to compute daily lapse rates from January 1989 to December 2004 for a medium-elevation study area in south-central Idaho. Daily lapse rates were grouped by month, synoptic weather type, and a combination of both (seasonal-synoptic). Daily air temperature lapse rates show high variabilityat both daily and seasonal time scales. Daily (T_(max) lapse rates show a distinct seasonal trend, with steeper lapse rates (greater decrease in temperature with height) occurring in summer and shallower rates (lesser decrease in temperature with height)occurring in winter. Daily (T_(min)and (T_(avg) lapse rates are more variable and tend to be steepest in spring and shallowest in midsummer. Different synoptic weather types also influence lapse rates, although differences are tenuous. In general, warmer air masses tend to be associated with steeper lapse rates for maximum temperature, and drier air masses have shallower lapse rates for minimum temperature. The largest diurnal range is produced by dry tropical conditions (clear skies, high solar input). Cross-validation results indicate that the commonly used environmental lapse rate [typically assumed to be-0.65 deg C (100 m)~(-1)] is solely applicable to maximum temperature and often grossly overestimates (T_(min)and (T_(avg) lapse rates. Regional lapse rates perform better than the environmental lapse rate for (T_(min)and (T_(avg), although for some months rates can be predicted more accurately by using monthly lapse rates. Lapse rates computed for different months, synoptic types, and seasonal-synoptic categories all perform similarly. Therefore, the use of monthly lapse rates is recommended as a practical combination of effective performance and ease of implementation.
机译:为了准确估计山区的近地表(2 m)空气温度,以进行水动力预测模型和其他环境过程研究,作者评估了当日和季节性变化(考虑到不同的天气类型)时,地表气温下降的速率为爱达荷州中南部的10000 km〜2的空间尺度。使用爱达荷州中南部一个中等高度研究区的1989年1月至2004年12月的近地表气温数据(T_(max)和(T_(avg))来计算每日流失率。失误率按月,天气类型和二者的组合(季节天气)进行分组;每日气温失误率在每日和季节性时间尺度上均表现出高度可变性;每日(T_(max)失误率则表现出明显的季节性趋势) ,夏季流失率(温度随高度的下降幅度较大)上升,冬季流失率(温度随高度的下降幅度较小)下降,冬季(T_(min)和(T_(avg))的流失率变化较大,并且倾向于春季最陡峭,仲夏最浅。虽然天气差异很小,但不同的天气类型也会影响流失率;通常,较高的空气质量往往与较高温度的较高的流失率和较干燥的空气质量有关。最低温度下的流失率较浅。白天最大的范围是由干燥的热带气候(晴朗的天空,高太阳输入)造成的。交叉验证结果表明,常用的环境消失率[通常假定为-0.65摄氏度(100 m)〜(-1)]仅适用于最高温度,并且经常被严重高估(T_(min)和(T_(平均失误率。(T_(min)和(T_(avg))的区域失误率比环境失效率要好,尽管在某些月份中可以使用每月失误率来更准确地预测失效率。 ,天气类型和季节天气类别的效果相似,因此,建议将每月流失率作为有效表现和易于实施的实用组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号