...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of computer assisted tomography >Pathologic Subgroups of Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia: Differential Diagnosis From Other Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias on High-Resolution Computed Tomography.
【24h】

Pathologic Subgroups of Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia: Differential Diagnosis From Other Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias on High-Resolution Computed Tomography.

机译:非特异性间质性肺炎的病理亚组:高分辨率计算机断层扫描与其他特发性间质性肺炎的鉴别诊断。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE:: To determine whether the subtypes of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) could be differentiated from other idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) on the basis of findings on high-resolution computed tomography (CT). METHODS:: Two observers evaluated the high-resolution CT findings in 90 patients with IIPs. The patients included 36 with NSIP, 11 with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), 8 with cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP), 10 with acute interstitial pneumonia (AIP), 14 with desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP) or respiratory bronchiolitis-associated interstitial lung disease (RB-ILD), and 11 with lymphoid interstitial pneumonia (LIP). The NSIP cases were subdivided into group 1 NSIP (n = 6), group 2 NSIP (n = 15), and group 3 NSIP (n = 15). RESULTS:: Observers made a correct diagnosis with a high level of confidence in 65% of NSIP cases, 91% of UIP cases, 44% of COP cases, 40% of AIP cases, 32% of DIP or RB-ILD cases, and 82% of LIP cases. Group 1 NSIP was misdiagnosed as AIP, DIP or RB-ILD, and LIP in 8.3% of patients, respectively. Group 2 NSIP was misdiagnosed as COP in 10% of patients, LIP in 6.7%, AIP in 3.3%, and DIP or RB-ILD in 3.3%. Group 3 NSIP was misdiagnosed as UIP in 6.7% of patients, COP in 6.7%, and DIP or RB-ILD in 3.3%. CONCLUSIONS:: In most patients, NSIP can be distinguished from other IIPs based on the findings on high-resolution CT. Only a small percentage of patients with predominantly fibrotic NSIP (group 3 NSIP) show overlap with the high-resolution CT findings of UIP.
机译:目的:根据高分辨率计算机断层扫描(CT)的发现,确定是否可以将非特异性间质性肺炎(NSIP)的亚型与其他特发性间质性肺炎(IIP)区分开。方法:两名观察员评估了90例IIP患者的高分辨率CT表现。患者包括36例NSIP,11例普通间质性肺炎(UIP),8例隐源性组织性肺炎(COP),10例急性间质性肺炎(AIP),14例伴有脱水性间质性肺炎(DIP)或呼吸性细支气管炎相关的间质性肺病(RB-ILD),以及11名淋巴性间质性肺炎(LIP)。 NSIP病例分为1组NSIP(n = 6),2组NSIP(n = 15)和3组NSIP(n = 15)。结果:观察者对65%的NSIP病例,91%的UIP病例,44%的COP病例,40%的AIP病例,32%的DIP或RB-ILD病例做出了正确的诊断,并充满信心82%的LIP病例。第1组NSIP分别被误诊为8.3%的患者为AIP,DIP或RB-ILD和LIP。第2组NSIP被误诊为COP的患者为10​​%,LIP为6.7%,AIP为3.3%,DIP或RB-ILD为3.3%。第3组NSIP被误诊为6.7%的患者为UIP,COP为6.7%,DIP或RB-ILD被误诊为3.3%。结论:在大多数患者中,根据高分辨率CT的发现,可以将NSIP与其他IIP区别开来。仅一小部分患有纤维化NSIP的患者(第3组NSIP)显示与UIP的高分辨率CT表现重叠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号