首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Immunology >Diagnostic Relevance and Clinical Significance of the New Enhanced Performance M2 (MIT3) ELISA for the Detection of IgA and IgG Antimitochondrial Antibodies in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis.
【24h】

Diagnostic Relevance and Clinical Significance of the New Enhanced Performance M2 (MIT3) ELISA for the Detection of IgA and IgG Antimitochondrial Antibodies in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis.

机译:新型增强性能M2(MIT3)ELISA在原发性胆汁性肝硬化中检测IgA和IgG抗线粒体抗体的诊断意义和临床意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/aims: Antimitochondrial antibodies (AMAs) are the serological hallmark of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of a new M2 enhanced performance enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (MIT3) for the detection of IgG- and IgA-specific isotypes of AMA in PBC patients including a number of PBC patients negative for AMA by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) as well as in patients with diverse, non-PBC disorders. We also investigated the clinical significance of IgG and IgA AMA in PBC. Methods: One hundred and three Greek PBC patients including 27 with AMA IIF-negative at the time of the investigation, 29 with autoimmune hepatitis-1 (AIH-1), 12 with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), 26 with hepatitis C virus (HCV), 15 with hepatitis B virus (HBV), and 29 healthy were investigated for AMA (IgG and IgA) using the MIT3-based ELISAs (INOVA Diagnostics, San Diego, CA). The samples were also tested by conventional anti-M2 ELISA (INOVA Diagnostics, Inc.). Results: The IgG MIT3-based ELISA significantly increased AMA detection in the cohort of PBC patients, over 26% of whom were AMA IIF-negative, from 63.1% by the conventional anti-M2, and 73.7% by IIF to 79.6% by MIT3-based ELISA (p<0.001). IgA AMAs were detected in 47.6% patients. Overall, IgG/IgA AMAs were detected in 84/103 (81.6%). IgG MIT3-based ELISA detected 12/27 IIF AMA-negative samples (44.4%), while IgG/IgA MIT3-based ELISAs detected 13/27 IIF AMA-negative patients (48.1%). The specificities of MIT3-based ELISAs (IgG and IgA) were 82.8% and 89.7%, respectively, in AIH-1, 100% and 93.3%, respectively, in HBV, 100% in PSC, and 96% and 93.3%, respectively, in HCV. Patients positive for IgG AMA had significantly more severe disease as shown by worse histology and elevated biochemical markers; IgG and IgA AMA titers were associated positively with the Mayo risk score but none of the isotypes were able to predict disease outcome. Conclusions: The new IgG and IgA MIT3-based ELISAs seem to have higher specificity and sensitivity for AMA detection than IIF and the conventional anti-M2. Interestingly, these assays were able to unmask AMA presence in almost half of the AMA-negative samples by IIF. These findings may suggest the use of MIT3-based ELISAs as first-line investigation for AMA detection, particularly, when the laboratories are unfamiliar with the use and interpretation of the IIF patterns of AMA. The presence of IgG AMA seems to characterize PBC patients with more severe disease, but both IgG and IgA isotypes of AMAs were not predictive markers of disease outcome.
机译:背景/目的:抗线粒体抗体(AMAs)是原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)的血清学标志。我们评估了一种新的M2增强性能酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)(MIT3)的敏感性和特异性,用于检测PBC患者中AMA的IgG和IgA特异性同种型,其中包括许多间接对AMA阴性的PBC患者免疫荧光(IIF)以及患有多种非PBC疾病的患者。我们还调查了PBC中IgG和IgA AMA的临床意义。方法:103名希腊PBC患者包括27例AMA IIF阴性,29例自身免疫性1型肝炎(AIH-1),12例原发性硬化性胆管炎(PSC),26例C型肝炎病毒(使用基于MIT3的ELISA(INOVA Diagnostics,圣地亚哥,加利福尼亚)调查了HCV),15例乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)和29例健康者的AMA(IgG和IgA)。还通过常规抗M2 ELISA(INOVA Diagnostics,Inc.)测试了样品。结果:基于IgG MIT3的ELISA显着提高了PBC患者队列中的AMA检测,其中26%以上的AMA IIF阴性,从常规抗M2的63.1%和IIF的73.7%到MIT3的79.6% ELISA(p <0.001)。在47.6%的患者中检测到IgA AMA。总体而言,在84/103(81.6%)中检测到IgG / IgA AMA。基于IgG MIT3的ELISA检测到12/27 IIF AMA阴性样品(44.4%),而基于IgG / IgA MIT3的ELISA检测到13/27 IIF AMA阴性患者(48.1%)。基于MIT3的ELISAs(IgG和IgA)在AIH-1中的特异性分别为82.8%和89.7%,在HBV中分别为100%和93.3%,在PSC中为100%,分别为96%和93.3% ,在HCV中。 IgG AMA阳性的患者病情严重得多,如组织学较差和生化指标升高所表明。 IgG和IgA AMA滴度与Mayo风险评分呈正相关,但同种型均不能预测疾病的预后。结论:基于IgG3和IgA MIT3的新ELISA似乎比IIF和常规抗M2具有更高的特异性和灵敏度。有趣的是,这些分析能够通过IIF揭示几乎一半的AMA阴性样品中AMA的存在。这些发现可能表明使用基于MIT3的ELISA作为AMA检测的一线研究,尤其是当实验室不熟悉AMA的IIF模式的使用和解释时。 IgG AMA的存在似乎是患有更严重疾病的PBC患者的特征,但是AMA的IgG和IgA同种型都不是疾病预后的预测指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号